tweetindex
DE

Md Ismail Šojal 🕷️

@0x0SojalSec · localhost · joined 05 Oct 2021

Cyber_Security_Re-searcher || Ai Re-searcher || AI-Sec|| Malware Analysis II iOS || Pwn || 0SINT || Project AI-StrikeSec || 0ldAccounts Suspended @0xSojalSec ||

54 584Followers
5 870Following
44 395Posts total
3.6MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Wild,Google mapped a fruit fly’s brain entire nervous system every wire connectome. then A real fruit fly brain just taught solved a Rubik’s cube with 166,000 neurons.Its brain still figured it out. https://t.co/yeY4IzdjSY
0:07
3K views · 18 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
DeepSeek just replaced V4-Pro with V4.1-Flash. already ripped the refusals out. You can run locally Uncensored DeepSeek’s new V4.1-Flash on a DSpark in Engram - same CED arch (8B prefill / 16B decode) - native image + text - 1M context - MIT - Heretic edit on 40 attention h
1.1K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@0x0SojalSec That's wild, 4GB is nothing these days. Gonna try this on my old laptop tonight. 125 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
New GLM-5.5 leak circulating Mythos-level performance. - Rumor says it could Performance above Mythos 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra - a 3T+ open-weight model with 1M context, - September release If even half of this holds, open-weight models just entered a different league. https://t.co/b
3.4K views · 43 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
Zuck is already building Muse Spark 2. - Rumored to go after GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5. Cheap to run. - Meta confirmed the next model is in development. - Built to compete with GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5 in cost to run - i think If this one is cheap and competitive, Meta’s can back h
1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
- i test it RTX 4060 laptop, 8GB VRAM: Q4_K_M 77 tok/s, 131k fits. - Do not expect 1M context on a laptop. - https://t.co/AQf3hCJm0b 352 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
You can run locally Uncensored Spark-X2.5-4B on your 4GB-8GB LapTops. - Zero Refusal - agent scores that embarrass some 9–12B models. - hybrid sliding+full attention - 1M context - agent/tool-call heavy - refuse vector sliced https://t.co/yGEkuluvcb
5.5K views · 73 likes · 12 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
You can run Fable-Trace-Qwen3.8-27B-TURBO Uncensored model locally on consumer hardware - thinking tokens cut to ½–⅒ - author ARC-C 0.735/ARC-E 0.882 (8-bit) - the author reserved for GPT / Claude / Gemini on his ARC suite. - 4-bit 0.719 - vision if you add mmproj - MTP quants h
9.8K views · 49 likes · 8 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@0x0SojalSec Dijkstra wasn't the fastest pathfinding algorithm. It was already improved by A* which is a greedy form of Dijkstra. Curious to know how this algo does compared to A* because visually seems very similar 49.2K views · 459 likes · 1 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
@0x0SojalSec They probably tested the optimized shortest-path algo on fungal mycelium networks 69.8K views · 408 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@0x0SojalSec We got Dijkstra 2 before GTA 6 143.2K views · 2.4K likes · 65 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Chinese scientists have developed, The best shortest-path algorithm in 41 years! A team from Tsinghua University has broken Dijkstra's "sorting barrier" - the first improvement since 1984. Just use for a world-map 🤯 Paper - https://t.co/z0SmpMY9Br https://t.co/3RzFgyGY
0:11
0:11
3.3M views · 29.1K likes · 3.1K reposts · 474 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

8 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe2 044dieses Konto1 018Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %3.75%dieses Konto3.77%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.59%dieses Konto1.66%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag2 0441 0182.01×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.75%3.77%0.99×
Interaktionsrate0.59%1.66%0.35×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.3M10 Jan
143.2K11 Jan
69.8K
49.2K
9.8K10 Sep
5.5K11 Sep
352
1.1K
3.4K
125
1.1K12 Sep
3K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.97%10 Jan
1.74%11 Jan
0.59%
0.96%
0.61%10 Sep
1.59%11 Sep
0.57%
0.36%
1.45%
0.00%
0.46%12 Sep
0.84%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.66%.

What the audience does

Likes60.0%32 561 in total
Reposts5.8%3 161 in total
Replies0.9%509 in total
Bookmarks33.2%18 040 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten