David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓

@1DavidClarke · London, England · joined 29 Oct 2013

🚀 Audit-ready SaaS & fintech. Strong cyber, data & AI governance. Enterprise wins without expensive teams.

95 295Followers

86 293Following

70 627Posts total

102.7KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓@1DavidClarke17 Aug

Most organisations buy a compliance automation platform expecting it to remove the pain of ISO 27001 or SOC 2. And it does remove a lot of pain. It collects evidence. Tracks tasks. Monitors controls. Keeps everything in one place. But there is one thing the platform cannot htt 29.1K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓@1DavidClarke27 Jul

Question for DPOs, GDPR practitioners, lawyers and compliance teams. Are you seeing more pressure to use AI on sensitive documents, while still needing to protect client identities, employee details, DSAR material, investigation records or confidential business information? http 403 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓@1DavidClarke27 Jul

Investors don’t only buy upside. They buy a reduced chance of looking stupid later. That’s where trust comes in. I’m looking for AI, SaaS, cyber, data and privacy founders for a few “Investor Trust Readiness” podcast episodes. We’ll talk about the questions buyers, investors 72.3K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓@1DavidClarke26 Jul

@EnergyOmbudsman Hi any chance of a reply to emails please? 680 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

David Clarke CITP FBCS CCISO ✓@1DavidClarke24 Jun

If you measure compliance by certificates held, you get a business full of certificates. If you measure it by "can we prove we're in control right now" — you get a different business entirely. Most boards are measuring the wrong thing. And finding out too late. 230 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

1 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe29 091dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %30.53%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.01%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	29 091	924	31.5×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	30.53%	3.62%	8.43×
Interaktionsrate	0.01%	1.52%	0.01×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

23024 Jun

68026 Jul

72.3K27 Jul

403

29.1K17 Aug

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.43%24 Jun

0.29%26 Jul

0.01%27 Jul

1.74%

0.01%17 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes50.0%15 in total

Reposts13.3%4 in total

Replies13.3%4 in total

Bookmarks23.3%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.