Aark Digital ✓

@Aark_Digital · Arbitrum · joined 25 Feb 2023

Futures Trading up to 1000x. Backed by the Best @Delphi_Digital, @HashKey_Capital, @BigBrainVC, @Arrington_Cap

129 987Followers

238Following

2 181Posts total

20.6KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital7 Sep

Solana, BNB Chain, and Robinhood Chain produced three different meme trades. USELESS runs on leverage, MARSCOIN on exchange listings, and PONS on launchpad fees and token burns. https://t.co/6yOryVbk9r 3K views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital5 Sep

ZEC is trading near $1,011 after Binance’s ZEC/USDT pair wicked to $252.46 during June’s Orchard selloff. In three months, the market turned a protocol-risk collapse into a fourfold recovery. https://t.co/EBhyZmT6Gc https://t.co/xjl1xA1W3c

4.1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital2 Sep

Three security incidents hit Cronos, Fogo, and Cosmos EVM. Cronos rolled back after the Tectonic exploit, Fogo halted after 400M FOGO left the Foundation, and a Cosmos EVM accounting bug was exploited across six chains. 3.8K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital1 Sep

Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech pushed rate markets toward a September hike as Bitcoin fell. At the same symposium, central banks outlined how public money could move on-chain. 4.1K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

@Aark_Digital Is this project aark live ?? 45 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

https://t.co/IqWq0QYdjl

185 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

Three metrics will show whether the cycle persists: 1. Daily protocol revenue and recurring burns 2. Robinhood and Base’s share and pool composition 3. Whether TVL holds as the fee switch reduces LP revenue 189 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

The bullish case is structural, not a supply shock. Uniswap usage now reduces UNI supply, but protocol fees remain only part of total swap fees. LP economics may weaken in affected pools, and burn rates will fall if volume contracts. 81 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

Robinhood Chain has become a material source of UNI burns. As of August 31, it contributed 1.15M UNI, or 11.1% of 10.33M in cumulative protocol fee burns. The dashboard does not show whether those fees came from tokenized stocks, memecoins or other pools. https://t.co/6HmNzrhSgM

91 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

v4 expanded protocol fee capture on July 27. Reported daily protocol revenue later rose from about $114,000 to $325,000. The shift matters because a larger share of Uniswap activity can now enter the TokenJar and FirePit mechanism. 91 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

UNIfication activated v2 and v3 protocol fee capture in December 2025. Fees accrue in TokenJar, and UNI must be burned through FirePit to claim those assets. This is not a cash distribution. It creates a recurring supply sink tied to protocol usage. https://t.co/AKwKgQlJgO 169 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

Total UNI burned has reached 110.326M. But 100M came from the initial one-time treasury burn. That leaves 10.326M UNI burned through recurring FirePit activity, valued by the dashboard at a cumulative $36.9M. https://t.co/g4juS58hXN https://t.co/BvRRHWazQr

432 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Aark Digital ✓@Aark_Digital31 Aug

Uniswap’s fee switch is converting swap activity into recurring UNI burns. On August 21, the mechanism reportedly burned 150,000 UNI, worth about $590,000, in one day. 4.2K views · 10 likes · 2 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

13 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. liegt bei Reichweite und Interaktion unter vergleichbaren Konten.

Medianaufrufe189dieses Konto6 004Median für 100K–1M

Reichweite, %0.15%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M

Interaktion, %0.43%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 100K–1M	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	189	6 004	0.03×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	0.15%	1.49%	0.10×
Interaktionsrate	0.43%	0.93%	0.46×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.2K31 Aug

432

169

189

185

4.1K1 Sep

3.8K2 Sep

4.1K5 Sep

3K7 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.43%31 Aug

0.93%

1.18%

1.10%

1.23%

0.53%

0.00%

0.27%1 Sep

0.29%2 Sep

0.17%5 Sep

0.43%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes68.6%48 in total

Reposts7.1%5 in total

Replies24.3%17 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten