tweetindex
DE

Annals of Int Med

@AnnalsofIM · Philadelphia, PA · joined 05 Mar 2010

Annals publishes content to inform medical professionals and society, advance standards of medical research, and improve the health of people worldwide.

73 895Followers
2 817Following
15 111Posts total
9.1KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

A new issue of Annals of Internal Medicine is online now. Read the latest at https://t.co/3JZh5hReTP https://t.co/WxQQ0lz3Wx
1.4K views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Watch this free video summary to understand the findings of a new systematic examining the effectiveness of hospital-based interventions to link patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) to outpatient follow-up after discharge. https://t.co/IisSusktCV https://t.co/9lKFkoUl07
1.1K views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
After Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs) abolished federal abortion protections, abortion access now varies state to state. A new commentary explores privacy risks related to abortion care documentation in the EMR after Dobbs and outlines three ethically grounded
1.9K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@AnnalsofIM AI can apologize and change course, acknowledging its prior mistake and analyzing the basis of that error. - Understanding and correcting error rebuilds trust. 20 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@AnnalsofIM Even if we had a perfect AI who would prevent it from being taken over by a human or another AI to deliberately harm?Ultimate treatment responsibility has to be with humans for all times to come 23 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
ICYMI: Periconception Parental Red Blood Cell Folate, Vitamin B12, and Birth Defects in Offspring: A Prospective Cohort Study https://t.co/qYaZr6SpQo https://t.co/6eNFoVx5hc
1.6K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
As artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly capable of clinical diagnosis, a new commentary argues that clinicians remain essential for managing risk and accountability, drawing on four uniquely human capacities that #AI cannot replicate. https://t.co/BVjjAHb31X https://t
3K views · 17 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. liegt bei Reichweite und Interaktion unter vergleichbaren Konten.

Medianaufrufe1 447dieses Konto1 018Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %1.96%dieses Konto3.77%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.18%dieses Konto1.66%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag1 4471 0181.42×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)1.96%3.77%0.52×
Interaktionsrate0.18%1.66%0.11×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3K10 Sep
1.6K
2311 Sep
20
1.9K
1.1K14 Sep
1.4K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.97%10 Sep
0.12%
0.00%11 Sep
0.00%
0.22%
0.18%14 Sep
0.76%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.66%.

What the audience does

Likes53.4%31 in total
Reposts25.9%15 in total
Replies3.4%2 in total
Bookmarks17.2%10 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten