Annals of Surgery

@AnnalsofSurgery · #VisualAbstract · joined 31 Oct 2011

The world's most referenced surgery journal—committed to discovering & disseminating the best of surgical science.

57 003Followers

336Following

11 260Posts total

85.3KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery7 Std.

Adding blood-based cancer biomarkers and fungal antibodies to a clinical prediction model improved discrimination of benign vs malignant indeterminate pulmonary nodules across 2 geographically distinct cohorts. https://t.co/sFBuwZebIK https://t.co/pRUYeUQt8j

122 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery15 Std.

In a national analysis of general surgery residents, EPA entrustment increased progressively across training, with most intraoperative activities reaching indirect supervision or practice-ready levels by PGY-3 or PGY-4. https://t.co/yw4gC6zEB0 https://t.co/B5mE4hEUrO

1.5K views · 5 likes · 4 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery7 Sep

@AnnalsofSurgery The volume drop is real; the case-mix shift is the story. Pens cut elective bariatrics — complex revisional and adjacent GS keep the lists full. Capacity follows the pathway, not the headline. 76 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery6 Sep

SLA-DR knockout pig kidneys provided long-term renal function in a preclinical xenotransplantation model, with 2 recipients surviving >1 year with excellent graft function, supporting their use as potential donor pigs in clinical trials. https://t.co/dpTVhaBHLV https://t.co/eIdUU

1.8K views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery6 Sep

@AnnalsofSurgery That −49% bariatric volume 2021–2025 chart matches what lists feel like on the ground. GLP-1 did not erase obesity care — it redistributed the case mix. Surgeons who kept general surgery breadth stayed busy while pure MBS volume compressed. 644 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery6 Sep

@AnnalsofSurgery Good. These procedures are barbaric, rife with complications and often require multiple revisions. The fewer the better. 3.4K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery5 Sep

Amid rapid GLP-1 receptor agonist adoption, bariatric surgery volume declined 49% from 2021 to 2025, while bariatric surgeons maintained operative activity by shifting toward other general surgery procedures. https://t.co/4SsCzEtDdw https://t.co/P3R9grpHDZ

47K views · 63 likes · 19 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery4 Sep

In a national analysis of DCD liver transplantation, both normothermic regional perfusion and normothermic machine perfusion were associated with improved graft survival compared with super-rapid recovery and static cold storage. https://t.co/LsC82yQQ7H https://t.co/Serixf81sy

3.4K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Annals of Surgery@AnnalsofSurgery10 Jun

In the age of GLP-1s why am I still reading post op disaster bariatric surgery CTs to evaluate leak/abscess? Is there any common sense left in medicine? Barbaric. @cremieuxrecueil @northwoods1980 @francisdeng @EricKnauerMD @nupedogg https://t.co/G7bJNvuDQp 27.3K views · 27 likes · 0 reposts · 19 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe1 795dieses Konto886Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %3.15%dieses Konto3.22%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.19%dieses Konto1.99%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	1 795	886	2.03×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	3.15%	3.22%	0.98×
Interaktionsrate	0.19%	1.99%	0.10×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

27.3K10 Jun

3.4K4 Sep

47K5 Sep

3.4K6 Sep

644

1.8K

767 Sep

1.5K

122

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.17%10 Jun

0.29%4 Sep

0.19%5 Sep

0.23%6 Sep

0.00%

0.28%

0.00%7 Sep

0.72%

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.99%.

What the audience does

Likes55.1%113 in total

Reposts12.2%25 in total

Replies12.7%26 in total

Quotes3.4%7 in total

Bookmarks16.6%34 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten