Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

@BulletinAtomic · Chicago, IL · joined 15 Mar 2011

Providing news on nuclear risk, climate change, and disruptive technologies. We set the Doomsday Clock. Receive updates: https://t.co/oxjCouHCYZ

73 166Followers

18 947Following

70 772Posts total

162.6KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic14 Sep

@BulletinAtomic Dumpy and Drunky desperately want to use a nuke. It is the most manly, warrior ethos, testosterone addled thing they could do to prove their greatness.😏 1.1K views · 33 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic13 Sep

@BulletinAtomic The dumbest administration ever is in charge of this recklessness? JFC. Take the keys away already. 2.8K views · 107 likes · 9 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic13 Sep

@BulletinAtomic Good thing America is stable and has quality leadership.... 4.2K views · 137 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic13 Sep

A new Pentagon strategy aims to expand battlefield nuclear options and blur the line between conventional and nuclear warfare—bypassing public oversight while raising the risk of unintended global escalation. https://t.co/wOHqkXw9bk 140K views · 470 likes · 251 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic3 Sep

@BulletinAtomic It was entirely thinkable, but nobody bothered. There is still remarkably little interest considering how accessible the tech is now, but that may change. 65 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic3 Sep

@BulletinAtomic from the text: "Al-Shaheen had a large budget" and " ... analysts even suggested that Ankara provided critical input in the planning stages of the rebel campaign." No money, no drones. "Proxy" shows twice, in the title & the key-words list at the end. = shall 106 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic2 Sep

The Pentagon has pursued options for a space-based defense system for decades. "But the physics and cost ensured that none of those systems has gotten off the drawing board," write Lisbeth Gronlund and David Wright. https://t.co/2nWa8IeroZ 2.2K views · 25 likes · 14 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic2 Sep

"In the early 2000s, it would have been unthinkable for small insurgent groups to develop sophisticated drone-building programs," writes Steven Feldstein. "A generation later, this technology has become cheaper and far more accessible." https://t.co/eRtghohg2T 5.2K views · 64 likes · 26 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic2 Sep

The physics and cost of a space-based defense system have ensured that none have gotten off the drawing board, write Lisbeth Gronlund and David Wright. "Still, hope springs eternal, as does the Pentagon's ability to ignore lessons from the past." https://t.co/2nWa8IeroZ 2.3K views · 20 likes · 12 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic31 Aug

Bulletin president and CEO Alexandra Bell discusses concerns surrounding nuclear policy and other existential threat issues that factored into the 2026 Doomsday Clock conversation. ⬇️ https://t.co/PWcGX9WGQ8 2.5K views · 16 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists@BulletinAtomic27 Aug

@RStatecraft recently covered the Bulletin's report, "The defense revolving-door, Silicon Valley edition" and interviewed author John Mecklin @meckdevil. 2.1K views · 4 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

11 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. genau im Median seiner Follower-Klasse.

Medianaufrufe2 311dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %3.16%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.84%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	2 311	924	2.50×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	3.16%	3.62%	0.87×
Interaktionsrate	1.84%	1.52%	1.21×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.1K27 Aug

2.5K31 Aug

2.3K2 Sep

5.2K

2.2K

1063 Sep

140K13 Sep

4.2K

2.8K

1.1K14 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.43%27 Aug

0.96%31 Aug

1.47%2 Sep

1.84%

1.92%

0.00%3 Sep

3.08%

0.54%13 Sep

3.31%

4.18%

3.43%14 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes58.5%878 in total

Reposts21.9%329 in total

Replies2.3%34 in total

Quotes0.5%8 in total

Bookmarks16.8%252 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten