tweetindex
DE

Burp Suite

@Burp_Suite · joined 26 Nov 2013

Burp Suite is the leading software for web security testing.

140 533Followers
14Following
7 401Posts total
68.9KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Two very different tests. One strong verdict. @C0d3Cr4zy used Burp AT to explore SQLi and test an app behind a WAF. It found the vulnerable input, validated an auth bypass and connected the evidence. “It works very well as a pentester’s copilot.” How are you using #BurpAT? htt
4.6K views · 19 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Burp Champion @fshiga used Burp AT to work through a complete attack chain in 3 hours: Enumeration + initial access → SQLi privilege escalation → sensitive file access via SSRF Days of manual analysis compressed into one morning. How far could #BurpAT take your next test? http
5K views · 27 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
4 minutes. 21 tool calls. Broken access control uncovered. 🔎 But the best part? @zahideroglu stayed in control, while Burp AT kept to scope and asked before acting. Got a Burp AT story? Share it with #BurpAT for a chance to win exclusive swag. https://t.co/gZoQVHjfy7
4.9K views · 28 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
One prompt. 9 minutes. A lot of ground covered. Read how Burp Champion Mohammad Abu Yahya used Burp AT for the first time. What could Burp AT do for you in 9 minutes? Share your story with #BurpAT for a chance to win exclusive swag. Full article 👉 https://t.co/wAAKPXvSBu http
5.9K views · 37 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
“Burp AT re-wrote the book.” Mario Contestabile used Burp AT to investigate potential IDOR and XSS findings in seconds, while keeping testing decisions firmly in his hands. Share your best Burp AT story with #BurpAT for a chance to win exclusive swag. We want to hear yours too!
6.6K views · 17 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@Burp_Suite The pricing page is not clear at all. If you already have a Pro subscription, how much is the AI usage? @PortSwigger 235 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Those boundaries are enforced by Burp, outside the model. Agents can propose actions, but they cannot execute anything Burp does not permit. Their requests and tool activity are recorded in the project, leaving evidence you can inspect and reproduce. 1.2K views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This is the first phase of Burp AT. Hand agents the investigations you rarely get time to finish. Explore more of the target while retaining control of scope, judgment and conclusions. Available now in public beta: https://t.co/VMWhsBRIDk 1.1K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
You decide how much work agents take on. Actions can proceed automatically, require your approval or be blocked entirely. The right level of autonomy can change with the task, target and risk. Burp’s manual tools remain available whenever you want to take over. 548 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
They also use purpose-built pentesting skills developed with PortSwigger Research. Instead of inventing a testing workflow from general model knowledge, agents can apply structured approaches designed for specific security tasks. 619 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Agents work inside your Burp project. They can use Burp Suite’s specialist tools and draw selectively on the traffic, target structure, issues and discoveries already gathered during the test. They work with the same context you do. 937 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
AI can already find and exploit vulnerabilities. But a professional pentest takes more than a capable model. It requires reliable tools, relevant context, specialist methodology and boundaries the model cannot bypass. Burp AT was built for that challenge. 1.6K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Introducing Burp AT. Agentic AI for human-led pentesting, with Burp Suite’s proven tools, your project context, and purpose-built skills. Now live in public beta for Burp Suite Professional users. https://t.co/VMWhsBRIDk 35.7K views · 113 likes · 53 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

5 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe4 965dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M
Reichweite, %3.53%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M
Interaktion, %0.63%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 100K–1MVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag4 9655 9830.83×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.53%1.49%2.37×
Interaktionsrate0.63%0.93%0.68×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

35.7K27 Jul
1.6K
937
619
548
1.1K
1.2K
23528 Jul
6.6K27 Aug
5.9K1 Sep
4.9K2 Sep
5K4 Sep
4.6K9 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.52%27 Jul
0.38%
0.32%
0.32%
0.55%
0.35%
0.17%
0.85%28 Jul
0.32%27 Aug
0.75%1 Sep
0.63%2 Sep
0.66%4 Sep
0.54%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes53.2%256 in total
Reposts14.3%69 in total
Replies5.6%27 in total
Quotes2.1%10 in total
Bookmarks24.7%119 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten