Columbia Journalism Review ✓

@CJR · New York, NY · joined 16 Jul 2009

Monitoring the press, tracking the evolving media business & encouraging excellence in journalism since 1961.

142 473Followers

3 341Following

68 733Posts total

8.1KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR4 Sep

@CJR Love this take 1 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR3 Sep

What sort of relationship should I have with AI, as a journalist? Resisting assumptions about the inevitable, with Anika Collier Navaroli. https://t.co/xuO8LUdxGF 1.7K views · 9 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR3 Sep

So are nonfiction books dead or not? Veteran agent Anna Sproul-Latimer on why people misunderstand who’s buying them and what writers should pitch, with @megreenwell on The Kicker. https://t.co/JvRgcHXumj https://t.co/RQf18Gyb2E 1.5K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR3 Sep

@CJR https://t.co/vEkHak2tK7 17 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR2 Sep

The Michigan Chronicle’s Sam Robinson on covering a closely watched election cycle from within. https://t.co/edQmRzM1li 1.7K views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR2 Sep

In a lawsuit against the FCC, ABC admits to self-censorship in the face of government pressure. A legal expert tells @JoelSimonSays, “In order to show harm, they had to open the bathrobe.” https://t.co/5tQaiOr9dB 1.7K views · 2 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Columbia Journalism Review ✓@CJR1 Sep

The Non-League Paper, devoted to the lowest tiers of English soccer, reports on more than a hundred games each week—and has earned a fan base of its own, writes Amos Barshad. https://t.co/xZsjMlaNdO 1.6K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe1 594dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M

Reichweite, %1.12%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M

Interaktion, %0.42%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 100K–1M	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	1 594	5 983	0.27×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	1.12%	1.49%	0.75×
Interaktionsrate	0.42%	0.93%	0.45×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K1 Sep

1.7K2 Sep

1.7K

173 Sep

1.5K

1.7K

14 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.13%1 Sep

0.42%2 Sep

0.29%

5.88%3 Sep

0.48%

0.71%

0.00%4 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes51.2%21 in total

Reposts24.4%10 in total

Replies7.3%3 in total

Bookmarks17.1%7 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten