ChainSafe ✓

@ChainSafeth · Toronto, Ontario · joined 23 Aug 2018

Infrastructure and protocol development for the decentralized web. Home of the @lodestar_eth Ethereum client & Forest🌲 Filecoin client.

13 891Followers

904Following

4 853Posts total

2.7KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth11 Sep

https://t.co/J4EaOYLWaK 67 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth11 Sep

We feel like this bears mentioning again: Forest drove a real miner to produce its first devnet blocks, and that’s simply massive. Breaking away from Go client dominance brings crucial client diversity, shielding the chain from shared single-language failures. Big ups to the 574 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth8 Sep

A lot of companies connect their documents to an AI assistant using a method called retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG. The documents are split into small chunks. Each chunk is turned into an embedding, which is a list of numbers that represents its meaning. When someone 517 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth4 Sep

The latest "This Month in Forest" is out! 🌲 ✅ Client diversity milestone: For the first time, a Forest node drove a real Filecoin miner (Curio / lotus-miner) all the way to producing blocks on a devnet, end to end. Next stop: calibnet. ✅ Enriched snapshots: Snapshots now 523 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth3 Sep

Your cloud provider says your data is safe because it runs inside a "confidential VM" that even they can't access. Intel, AMD, and Nvidia sell the chips that are supposed to guarantee that. Last year, researchers at Georgia Tech and Purdue broke it with a device costing under ht

0:05

522 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

ChainSafe ✓@ChainSafeth2 Sep

Bookmark this 👇 469 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe520dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %3.74%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.81%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	520	924	0.56×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	3.74%	3.62%	1.03×
Interaktionsrate	0.81%	1.52%	0.53×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4692 Sep

5223 Sep

5234 Sep

5178 Sep

57411 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.85%2 Sep

1.34%3 Sep

0.76%4 Sep

2.13%8 Sep

0.17%11 Sep

0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes64.3%18 in total

Reposts7.1%2 in total

Replies25.0%7 in total

Bookmarks3.6%1 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.