DCRjournal

@DCRjournal · joined 07 Oct 2011

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum is the world's leading publication in colorectal surgery, ranking in top 17% of all peer-reviewed surgery journals. #DCRJournal

17 796Followers

632Following

10 599Posts total

4.6KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

DCRjournal@DCRjournal15 Sep

#DCRJournal Letter to the Editor | CRC Screening, A Long Way Off: https://t.co/AnV8HMhe6v Author Reply: https://t.co/EcKm53PZTS https://t.co/9hNqWt2cNT

521 views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

DCRjournal@DCRjournal14 Sep

#DCRJournal Didactic Video | Single-Port Robotic Transstomal End Colostomy Resection and Closure: https://t.co/uG7MOwhaOv @MadelineDAquila; @SchultzKurt; @haddonjpantel; @YaleSurgery https://t.co/rulVFE97cZ

0:41

1.8K views · 24 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

DCRjournal@DCRjournal13 Sep

@DCRjournal I’m curious whether the reply quantifies how strong an unmeasured confounder would need to be to erase the treatment effect. I’d dig deeper with Sci-Quest, a biomedical literature review platform: https://t.co/AMUYFvZ8PU 15 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

DCRjournal@DCRjournal12 Sep

#DCRJournal Letter to the Editor | Comment on “Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score–Matched Study”: https://t.co/BWGOCGO1Nq Author Reply: https://t.co/GNlfewobOq https://t.co/677r0JbR8b

800 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

DCRjournal@DCRjournal11 Sep

"Herrmann & Desfosses, of the anal glands" by Paul Lehur, @EmilieDuchalais @CHUnantes #ColorectalResearch @DCRjournal: https://t.co/umiZ0Vrn1I https://t.co/Eu54ICoS8k

722 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

DCRjournal@DCRjournal10 Sep

#DCRJournal FREE Article of the Week is OUT! Can robot-assisted upfront fascia-guided TME provide good outcomes for T3 rectal cancer? Find out in this month's DCR: https://t.co/SsnEjyZ0Ym https://t.co/ApfhOy5vOh

687 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe704dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %3.96%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.71%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	704	924	0.76×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	3.96%	3.62%	1.09×
Interaktionsrate	0.71%	1.52%	0.46×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

68710 Sep

72211 Sep

80012 Sep

1513 Sep

1.8K14 Sep

52115 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.58%10 Sep

0.83%11 Sep

0.38%12 Sep

0.00%13 Sep

1.59%14 Sep

0.96%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes55.2%37 in total

Reposts13.4%9 in total

Replies1.5%1 in total

Bookmarks29.9%20 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.