Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓

@FarzinNadimi · Washington, DC · joined 08 Oct 2020

Defense & security analyst, author, Middle East/Iran scholar, military historian, frequent media commentator, Senior Fellow of the Washington Institute

21 609Followers

325Following

1 742Posts total

81.5KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi15 Sep

https://t.co/ovHJKrTiF7 Read the latest @WashInstitute PolicyWatch by Michael Eisenstadt (@meisenstadt58) and myself on how Iran is likely to rebuild its military. We argued that Tehran will continue to focus on missiles and drones, and by doing so they create path dependencies 1.8K views · 22 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi6 Sep

@FarzinNadimi Iran does not enjoy the ability track and target these distant ships or indeed the far closer destroyer screen. Apaches and Warthogs kill any surface vessels shortly after they leave shore. Often before. 772 views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi6 Sep

@FarzinNadimi https://t.co/BS7bHjZfLC

401 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi6 Sep

@FarzinNadimi Quite interesting they're expending precious AShBMs in a long shot attempt to hit a US warship but haven't even tried to hit one of the very vulnerable ship-to-ship transfer clusters off the UAE. 2.5K views · 11 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi6 Sep

The IRGC is going to great lengths to inflict a significant, humiliating blow on the United States by sinking or badly damaging a U.S. warship—especially an aircraft carrier. They have not succeeded yet, and recent events show they are doubling down with probably more capable 55.9K views · 223 likes · 41 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi4 Aug

(1/2) Iran’s 1993 ‘Act on the Marine Areas of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Persian Gulf and the Oman Sea’ (Iranian regime does not recognize UNCLOS) gives Tehran multiple legal hooks it can exploit under either a 50-50 or 75-25 geographic arrangement for the Strait of 3.2K views · 7 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi27 Jul

@FarzinNadimi @WhiteHouse @marklevinshow ... Please read 80 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi27 Jul

@FarzinNadimi تصویر احتمالا مطعلق به این کارگاه هست که در چین هست اشتباه گفتم روسیه https://t.co/iaqYIbQdLY

0:29

878 views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi26 Jul

@FarzinNadimi به نظر می رسد که آمریکایی ها پلن ب برای این جنگ نداشتند. البته شاید هم به نظر من این طور می رسد ... آمریکا حاضر به ریسک بیشتر نیست، جمهوری اسلامی هم دستش را خوانده، کشورهای عربی هم که پراکنده، سراسیمه و منفعل... 468 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi26 Jul

آیا وقفه کنونی در حملات تلافی‌جویانه آمریکا و ایران نشانه موفقیت میانجی‌گری است، یا تنها آرامش پیش از طوفان؟ ایران همچنان در تلاش است شرایط تنگه هرمز را دیکته کند، در حالی که حوثی‌ها با اشتیاق جبهه دومی در دریای سرخ گشوده‌اند. پرسش کلیدی این است که آیا واشینگتن می‌تواند هزینه 12.9K views · 142 likes · 8 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Farzin Nadimi, PhD فرزین ندیمی ✓@FarzinNadimi25 Jul

Is the current pause in U.S.-Iranian tit-for-tat strikes a sign of successful mediation, or merely the calm before the storm? Iran is still trying to dictate the terms of the Strait of Hormuz while the Houthis enthusiastically open a second front in the Red Sea. Massing more U.S. 2.6K views · 22 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

11 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe1 776dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %8.22%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.75%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	1 776	924	1.92×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	8.22%	3.62%	2.27×
Interaktionsrate	0.75%	1.52%	0.49×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.6K25 Jul

12.9K26 Jul

468

87827 Jul

3.2K4 Aug

55.9K6 Sep

2.5K

401

772

1.8K15 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.00%25 Jul

1.20%26 Jul

0.64%

1.94%27 Jul

0.00%

0.44%4 Aug

0.51%6 Sep

0.55%

0.75%

1.17%

1.63%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes73.2%458 in total

Reposts9.9%62 in total

Replies5.1%32 in total

Quotes0.5%3 in total

Bookmarks11.3%71 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten