tweetindex
DE

Gearbox Protocol ✓

@GearboxProtocol · joined 10 Sep 2017

Institutional-grade, no-code lending infrastructure for tokenised assets and RWAs. Real-World Assets need Real-World Lending.

54 809Followers
36Following
4 682Posts total
48KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

There won't be any RWA looping on Gearbox... but there will be RWA leverage. 0 slippage. One click. Automated RWA Leverage. R_TO_EN_S_ the world. https://t.co/e1vip7JOAQ 2.2K views · 23 likes · 7 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
DeFi is the big unlock for RWAs, yet 88% of them sit outside it. Not for long. Leverage for @Securitize and @MidasRWA goes live on Gearbox next. https://t.co/7ujHe9nl1C 3K views · 30 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@GearboxProtocol @kpk_io Solid precautions keep Gearbox fully protected. 16 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Gearbox curators have no direct exposure to rsETH and the protocol continues to operate safely. In response to recent developments, @kpk_io has proactively restricted the creation of any new exposure to rsETH. Out of caution, borrowing against tETH and DETH has been paused as 3.8K views · 25 likes · 3 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
Update for borrowers of legacy V3 pools curated by Chaos Labs. As we transition to a lending stack purpose-built for tokenised assets and automated RWA leverage, the legacy V3 markets curated by Chaos Labs will be sunset. While this marks the next phase of Gearbox as https://t. 2K views · 18 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@GearboxProtocol Great work, DM me 🚀 179 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
There's no looping on Gearbox anymore. Why? Because there never was. Looping is fundamentally inefficient. You borrow against your deposit, buy more of the same asset, and redeposit it repeatedly to create leverage. Every step bleeds efficiency. ◾️ Looping manually? Repeatedly 36.8K views · 142 likes · 13 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

3 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. genau im Median seiner Follower-Klasse.

Medianaufrufe2 174dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %3.97%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %1.27%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag2 1749242.35×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.97%3.62%1.10×
Interaktionsrate1.27%1.52%0.84×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

36.8K16 Nov
1793 Dec
2K6 Mar
3.8K19 Apr
1620 Aug
3K24 Aug
2.2K27 Aug

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.48%16 Nov
0.00%3 Dec
1.09%6 Mar
0.95%19 Apr
0.00%20 Aug
1.27%24 Aug
1.66%27 Aug

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes61.7%238 in total
Reposts8.0%31 in total
Replies7.5%29 in total
Quotes2.6%10 in total
Bookmarks20.2%78 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten