tweetindex
DE

IBM Research

@IBMResearch · 12 labs on 6 continents · joined 16 Sep 2008

Inventing what's next in science and technology. 🌍🔬 Subscribe to our newsletter: https://t.co/kyfsvQNzsV

231 401Followers
1 085Following
20 342Posts total
184.8KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

@IBMResearch Glad you're trying at least, but it's just not working out so far. These models aren't even that strong and you're still losing to them. 1.9K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Build what’s next with Granite 4.2: https://t.co/XVxwhVSwmw Available on: @huggingface, @replicate ,@DeepInfra, @ollama, @lmstudio, @AnythingLLM, @radixark, @OpenRouter, @ArtificialAnlys, @CoreWeave, @arena, @UnslothAI 5.7K views · 60 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Inside the release: ✅ 3B, 8B and 30B models with native thinking capabilities ✅ Advanced coding and software engineering capabilities ✅ Optimized speech models for high-throughput transcription workloads ✅ Flexible deployment across cloud, on-premises and edge environments 7.4K views · 86 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Meet Granite 4.2, IBM’s latest family of open models purpose-built for enterprise agentic AI. With new native reasoning capabilities, Granite 4.2 can plan, reason, self-correct and reliably use tools to help automate complex enterprise workflows ⬇️ 84.1K views · 711 likes · 57 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →
Quantum computers run cold. Really cold. ❄️ @LiveScience takes a look inside IBM’s new modular cryogenic architecture, designed to connect quantum processors while keeping them at temperatures near absolute zero. 🧵 A few things worth knowing: 10.4K views · 186 likes · 32 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
In "@SpiderMan: Brand New Day", Prof. Banner lectures on quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the study of how quarks and gluons form protons and neutrons. Fun Fact: Researchers from BasQ are using @IBM quantum computers to understand physical theories like QCD https://t.co/YhPjFGxgsG 6.9K views · 33 likes · 17 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
How do you trust a quantum result when classical verification is no longer possible? See how researchers from @UChicago, Qedma, and Algorithmiq demonstrated quantum advantage based on frameworks designed to build trust in quantum computation. 🧵👇 https://t.co/EFreIDwu0f 6.8K views · 34 likes · 9 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@IBMResearch @IBM @CNSE Impressive names, polished announcement — but the real question isn’t what’s printed on a 300 mm wafer. It’s whether Loon and Nighthawk deliver stable logic depth, error transparency, and verifiable advantage outside a controlled demo. Until IBM can show 290 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@IBM @CNSE The fabrication of IBM Quantum chips at the Albany NanoTech Complex—and the close synchronization between semiconductor experts and physicists across Albany and at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown—is key to the success of quantum computing at IBM. h 2.1K views · 24 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@IBM @CNSE This story is about more than processing quantum chips on larger wafers. It’s about using the best possible minds, machinery, and processes to realize quantum computing. https://t.co/RhS133g4fK 2.1K views · 21 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@IBM @CNSE The larger, 300mm wafer can carry more individual chips than its 200mm predecessor, allowing for more cost-effective chip yield per wafer and therefore providing shorter (faster) iteration and implementation cycle times. https://t.co/Z6k7ITRcKE 1.2K views · 18 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
.@IBM reveals latest quantum processors—IBM Quantum Loon and IBM Quantum Nighthawk—and all future chips on our quantum development roadmap are being fabricated at the Albany NanoTech Complex (@CNSE) using 300mm semiconductor wafer technology: https://t.co/45p1ZwcMib #QDC25 https 55.8K views · 707 likes · 173 reposts · 49 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird mehr Menschen gezeigt als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe6 945dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M
Reichweite, %3.00%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M
Interaktion, %0.98%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 100K–1MVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag6 9455 9831.16×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.00%1.49%2.01×
Interaktionsrate0.98%0.93%1.05×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

55.8K12 Nov
1.2K
2.1K
2.1K
290
6.8K10 Aug
6.9K11 Aug
10.4K19 Aug
84.1K25 Aug
7.4K
5.7K
1.9K

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.70%12 Nov
1.78%
1.16%
1.42%
2.41%
0.72%10 Aug
0.73%11 Aug
2.23%19 Aug
0.98%25 Aug
1.30%
1.17%
0.47%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes67.8%1 895 in total
Reposts11.0%307 in total
Replies3.8%106 in total
Quotes1.9%53 in total
Bookmarks15.6%435 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten