tweetindex
DE

International Security

@IntSecHarvard · Cambridge, MA · joined 16 Jul 2013

International Security is a leading peer-reviewed journal of security affairs, global and broadly defined.

20 255Followers
655Following
2 335Posts total
92.3KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Attending APSA? Stop by the MIT Press booth tomorrow, September 4, 4-5:30pm for drinks, nibbles, new magnets, and help International Security celebrates its 50th! https://t.co/EOWkyE39no
Four stacks of magnets with the International Security logo on a white table in front of a globe squeezy ball and copies of the journal.
3.1K views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
We hope you enjoy the new issue of International Security! Summer 2026: https://t.co/GFIQnL3I4u 1.6K views · 4 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“The Return of Nationalist Geopolitics: Liberal Backsliding and Armed Conflict,” by Lars-Erik Cederman, Paola Galano Toro, @lucgirardin, @andijot, Julian Wucherpfennig https://t.co/q3VoTj2zlu 944 views · 7 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Correspondence: The Challenge of Studying What China Wants.” @RushDoshi, @AGhiselliChina, Todd Hall, Jamie Gruffydd-Jones, and Arash Heydarian Pashakhanlou respond to David Kang, @SiuHeiWong2, and @ZenobiaChan’s Summer 2025 article. https://t.co/cduN7cpj83 10.3K views · 15 likes · 7 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Seeing Through 'Transparent Oceans': Emerging Technology, Submarine Vulnerability, and the Future of MAD,” by Eli Sanchez @MIT_SSP https://t.co/trCKdcGviW 1.8K views · 9 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“The Iron Cage of International Anarchy,” by @MearsheimerJ https://t.co/GX9473j8ZY Ungated thanks to @mitpress 1.8K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
International Security is celebrating its 50th birthday! This and future issues will include essays on how the world and the security studies field have evolved over the past five decades and what the future may hold. 3.1K views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Articles from the issue include: “International Security at Fifty Years,” by @stephenWalt https://t.co/ezHgs1UNUu Ungated thanks to @mitpress 10.4K views · 24 likes · 12 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The Summer 2026 issue is online! Read articles @stephenWalt, @MearsheimerJ, Lars-Erik Cederman et al (incl. @lucgirardin, @andijot), and Eli Sanchez. Plus letters on studying what China wants. https://t.co/GFIQnL3I4u 19.4K views · 88 likes · 29 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
We hope you enjoy the new issue of International Security! Spring 2026: https://t.co/DsYU0jt03G 565 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
“Blockade by Fire: China's Potential to Blockade Taiwan Using Missile Attacks on Ports,” by Kerby Davis and Eugene Gholz https://t.co/uwu5ve71Fn This article is Open Access. 782 views · 7 likes · 6 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Correspondence: Paradigms and Power.” Stacie Goddard, Paul MacDonald, Daniel Nexon, and @RRajagopalanJNU respond to Mearsheimer’s Spring 2025 article. https://t.co/47OD75WLRh 2.8K views · 11 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Correspondence: Realism, Russia, and Ukraine.” Jim Goldgeier and Brian Taylor respond to Posen’s Winter 2024/25 article. https://t.co/km3i3K6ijZ 660 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“The Cost of Restraint: India's Divergent Responses to China and Pakistan as Nuclear Rivals,” by @the_nuclearyogi and @rohan_mukh https://t.co/yM8TWG4JMf This article is Open Access. 6.5K views · 10 likes · 8 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Escalate to Survive? Nuclear First Use in Contemporary Great Power Conflict,” by @Fiona_Cunning and @KBruusgaard https://t.co/yNqWN30XL2 This article is Open Access. 931 views · 11 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
“Competition Under the Security Dilemma,” by Sebastian Rosato https://t.co/eqBWMYBYkM 1.9K views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The issue includes: “The Ideology Trap: China and the Limits of Cold War Analogies,” by @eunajo_ and @jessicacweiss https://t.co/orn8mbty5i 5.7K views · 38 likes · 16 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
***Announcement*** The new Spring 2026 issue is online! Articles by @eunajo_, @jessicacweiss, Sebastian Rosato, @Fiona_Cunning, @kbruusgaard, @the_nuclearyogi, @rohan_mukh, Kerby Davis, Eugene Gholz Correspondence on paradigms, realism, and Ukraine. https://t.co/DsYU0jt03G 7.2K views · 45 likes · 20 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Read @joelfbrenner 's new piece in @lawfare about AI and the degree to which it can make predictive judgments in complex environments. The International Security article is now *free to access* @mitpress : https://t.co/Kd7CZ7sIJu @DrJLHazelton 2.8K views · 12 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Even the most capable AI will face limits on its ability to make predictions and substitute for strategic decision-making, writes @joelfbrenner. https://t.co/hp2vDSZ6F5 https://t.co/tdGi9Q2zwm
5.8K views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
1) ***Announcement*** The new Winter 2025/26 issue is online! Read articles by Ron Krebs; @JaninaDill, Emily Myers, and Livia Schubiger; @LenMaschmeyer; @joelfbrenner; and @John_Severini and Stephen Biddle https://t.co/DsYU0jt03G 4.3K views · 29 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe3 052dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %15.07%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.51%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag3 0529243.30×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)15.07%3.62%4.16×
Interaktionsrate0.51%1.52%0.33×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6.5K4 Jun
660
2.8K
782
565
19.4K13 Aug
10.4K
3.1K
1.8K
1.8K
10.3K
944
1.6K
3.1K3 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.29%4 Jun
0.61%
0.54%
1.79%
0.53%
0.61%13 Aug
0.36%
0.38%
0.60%
0.71%
0.22%
1.38%
0.51%
0.23%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes50.4%343 in total
Reposts20.6%140 in total
Replies2.5%17 in total
Bookmarks26.5%180 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten