Magma Finance ✓

@Magma_Finance · joined 19 Nov 2024

Building the most adaptive liquidity engine on Sui. Powered by @SuiNetwork. 🔗: https://t.co/cRjtd9Ba3o

28 867Followers

66Following

1 758Posts total

179.3KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance7 Sep

GM Magma community 🌋☀️ New week, new focus. Magma 2.0 is still cooking for the next phase of Sui DeFi. ⚡ Quick question for the community: When you use a DEX, what matters most to you? ⚡ Better execution 🌊 Deeper liquidity 💰 Lower slippage 🔁 More trading routes Drop 574 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance5 Sep

Markets often look quiet before the next story forms. That is when infrastructure projects matter most. 🌋 Magma is building through the quiet phase with a clear focus: Prop AMM. Better market structure. Stronger Sui DeFi foundations. More room for future activity. Attention 1.1K views · 16 likes · 2 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance4 Sep

For LPs, the real question is not only where to place capital. It is whether that capital is actually being used. Idle liquidity does not create strong markets. Magma 2.0 focuses on improving liquidity productivity — helping capital support more meaningful trading activity htt

1.1K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance4 Sep

@Magma_Finance The price trend of MAGMA has proven your lies. Everything you said is fake. You shameless scammer. 35 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance3 Sep

@Magma_Finance Exactly, the best infrastructure is the kind you never have to think about because it just works. Looking forward to seeing how 2.0 handles the load. 57 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance3 Sep

@Magma_Finance infra that only gets noticed when it breaks is the whole job lol. magma 2.0 better be cutting that 0.3%+ slippage on mid caps cause that's where the pain is real. what's the actual fill latency improvement vs v1? 30 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance3 Sep

The best trading infrastructure is usually invisible. Users only notice when something goes wrong: High slippage. Thin depth. Slow response. Poor execution. ⚡ Magma 2.0 is built to improve the layer behind the trade, so users can access smoother markets without thinking about h

1.3K views · 19 likes · 2 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance9 Dec 2025

@Magma_Finance @SuiNetwork @HashKey_Capital @snzholding @SevenXVentures @PuzzleVentures @navi_protocol @zellic_io Keep on rising ⚡ 752 views · 17 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance8 Dec 2025

The liquidity layer for the next generation of Move DeFi. Don't fade the Magma. https://t.co/DG7YQYPs5y https://t.co/mDQXhdzdi8

3.5K views · 32 likes · 3 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance8 Dec 2025

Capital inefficiency on @SuiNetwork ends here. Magma solves liquidity fragmentation and high management friction, delivering the best execution for traders and real yield for LPs. Security is cleared ✅ Audited by @Zellic_io & @threesigmaxyz. 4.6K views · 29 likes · 2 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Magma Finance ✓@Magma_Finance8 Dec 2025

Magma is rising. 🌋 We’ve secured $6M in strategic funding to build the most adaptive liquidity engine on @SuiNetwork. Backed by high-conviction partners: 🤝 @HashKey_Capital, @snzholding, @SevenXVentures, @PuzzleVentures, Topspin Ventures. And strong ecosystem support from: htt

166.1K views · 537 likes · 387 reposts · 306 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. erreicht weniger Menschen als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe574dieses Konto922Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %1.99%dieses Konto3.42%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.37%dieses Konto1.53%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	574	922	0.62×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	1.99%	3.42%	0.58×
Interaktionsrate	1.37%	1.53%	0.90×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

166.1K8 Dec

4.6K

3.5K

7529 Dec

1.3K3 Sep

354 Sep

1.1K

1.1K5 Sep

5747 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.78%8 Dec

0.87%

1.36%

2.66%9 Dec

2.02%3 Sep

0.00%

0.00%4 Sep

1.37%

2.01%5 Sep

1.74%7 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes44.3%667 in total

Reposts26.4%398 in total

Replies22.5%339 in total

Quotes5.3%80 in total

Bookmarks1.5%23 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten