tweetindex
DE

Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki ✓

@MatthewWielicki · United States · joined 05 Nov 2020

Director - United States Global Change Research Program (@usgcrp), husband, father, Polish immigrant, https://t.co/oHJwRZwFmu (Personal account not official)

100 607Followers
2 335Following
65 646Posts total
2.1MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

@MatthewWielicki Hurricanes lost their funding this year. 1.7K views · 181 likes · 4 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki No symptoms is one of the symptoms. 🤣 8.1K views · 177 likes · 4 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki Because its now The Gulf of America. 3.7K views · 246 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Where are the headlines? https://t.co/9EeF9Nw9Mh
1.1M views · 23.4K likes · 5.7K reposts · 1.3K replies Open on X →
👇 6.3K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki You’d think competence or basic knowledge is a requirement to be head of a US climate program. Apparently not. What is the difference in global temperature between an ice age and interglacial, Matthew? 1.5K views · 131 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
5C difference in global warming, is the difference between an ice age and the pre-industrial climate. Now imagine a climate 3 or 4C warmer. You’d think being head of a US climate program would be aware of such basic facts. 10.1K views · 187 likes · 28 reposts · 34 replies Open on X →
Is a couple of degrees of warming by 2100 really an emergency? Well, let's put that into context... That's about the temperature change from 8am to 10am in most major cities. Are we experiencing an emergency every morning? https://t.co/VscBHMHGJr
97.6K views · 195 likes · 37 reposts · 124 replies Open on X →
Where exactly is the “climate crisis”? Not in reported disaster frequency. Not in weather-related losses as a share of global GDP. And certainly not in human lives... disaster deaths have collapsed over the past century. CO₂ increased. The planet warmed. Yet humanity became htt
39.4K views · 732 likes · 304 reposts · 33 replies Open on X →
Melting bedrock? 🤷‍♂️ 2.3K views · 20 likes · 0 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki The way the deniers are desperately trying to avoid saying that this was probably caused by destabilisation of the bedrock through melting, is really quite funny. They are tying themselves, like Weilicki is here, in quite complex knots. 2.3K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
Not a glacial collapse... Why do I have to keep saying this? https://t.co/eEjlZ6Hh0Y 7.2K views · 299 likes · 58 reposts · 46 replies Open on X →
It’s strange how every natural disaster now apparently needs a villain. A flood? Climate change. A landslide? Climate change. A glacier or mountainside collapses? Climate change. And if that doesn’t work, blame a dam, development, or some other human activity. Sometimes nature 7.7K views · 315 likes · 66 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →
But they made a pledge... The hypocrisy knows no bounds. https://t.co/gcIRLSeWdm 3.7K views · 30 likes · 11 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
This is me in Tibet, near the Great Bend of the Yarlung Tsangpo... the region where China is now building its enormous hydropower project. The site of that mega-project is roughly 570 miles (920 km) east of the source of last week’s catastrophic Nepal–Tibet flash flood. In htt 12.4K views · 248 likes · 67 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki Bedrock collapse...the glacier was just along for the ride 1K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki It’s what Mother Nature does to carve a canyon. Sometimes a peaceful river that slowly moves sediment, sometimes a raging torrent that removes canyon walls and moves giant boulders, with gravel, sand, and mud. All humans can do is stay clear and marvel at the bea 1.7K views · 19 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki i'm gonna blame the Chinese whether it was their fault or not. 827 views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
STOP BLAMING A CHINESE DAM. The evidence is clear: this disaster originated with a massive ice-rock/glacier collapse in NEPAL near Langtang Lirung. The debris then tore down the valley, crossed into Tibet, and devastated the border region. Hydropower infrastructure was https:// 236.5K views · 498 likes · 105 reposts · 83 replies Open on X →
Now that my official position is public, there's understandably a lot being written about me. If you're interested in what I actually think about climate and energy policy, I encourage you to read my own work rather than someone else's interpretation. My Substack at https://t.co 31.3K views · 522 likes · 148 reposts · 60 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki Are you actually a moron or do you just act like one as a grift? 596 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki The DMV doesn't automatically deny you a license just because you currently drive a lot. 263 views · 29 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MatthewWielicki Absolutely. The DMV has a much better price/performance than hospitals and doesn't charge $15,000 to renew your license. 580 views · 50 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Your daily reminder that Medicare for All would save $650 billion and 68,000 lives each and every year, per CBO and the Yale School of Public Health. 534.3K views · 8K likes · 2.4K reposts · 248 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

19 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird weit über das eigene Publikum hinaus gezeigt, und es reagiert.

Medianaufrufe6 264dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M
Reichweite, %6.23%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M
Interaktion, %2.32%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 100K–1MVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag6 2645 9831.05×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)6.23%1.49%4.18×
Interaktionsrate2.32%0.93%2.50×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.7K1 Sep
7.7K
7.2K
2.3K2 Sep
2.3K
39.4K3 Sep
97.6K6 Sep
10.1K
1.5K
6.3K
1.1M21 Sep
3.7K22 Sep
8.1K
1.7K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.23%1 Sep
5.37%
5.68%
0.43%2 Sep
1.28%
2.78%3 Sep
0.39%6 Sep
2.52%
8.79%
0.19%
2.90%21 Sep
6.85%22 Sep
2.32%
11.37%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes70.1%35 304 in total
Reposts17.7%8 896 in total
Replies4.0%2 021 in total
Quotes1.2%620 in total
Bookmarks7.0%3 533 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten