tweetindex
DE

Nicholas A. Peppas

@NPeppas · University of Texas at Austin · joined 31 May 2013

Cockrell Family Regents Chair, Chemical Engn Biomedical Engn, Dell Medical School, Pharmacy -- Institute of Biomaterials, Drug Delivery & Regenerative Medicine

21 023Followers
352Following
22 891Posts total
5.6KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

https://t.co/r5Ba9OovYe 649 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
DON PAUL MEMORIAL https://t.co/NV4zvUjfB6 696 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@NPeppas @Liv_nano_ @ScienceAdvances What's with the emphasis on zwitterionic polymersd Are they really making a comeback as alternatives to PEG-ylated nanoparticlesd. 24 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@NPeppas "Hey guys! Looks like a fun party!". 18 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Surface chemistry governs sex-dependent responses to PEG and zwitterionic siRNA nanocarriers in primary macrophages by @Liv_nano_ Olivia Lanier, @NPeppas et al, published in @ScienceAdvances https://t.co/81OnqLry0Q https://t.co/UztpnbcHCo
2.4K views · 31 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@NPeppas Hey Nicholas! Looks like you've got a fantastic team building moments there!. 19 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
A special group, aren't they?? From left: NAP, Jesus, Ishaan, Miranda, Fabiola, Maryam, Mafalda, Kristie, Rachel, Ananya, Paige, Jenny, Annika, Justine, Serenity, Jessica, Maia, Victoria and Armaan. @NPeppas lab https://t.co/3ytAkK3Tey
974 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@Liv_nano_ Olivia Lanier of @UNM with her research group and @MichaelMitchell of @UPenn who gave a seminar today. https://t.co/ujDtM4E1Rk
822 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

8 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. übliche Reichweite für diese Größe, schwächere Reaktion als bei den meisten.

Medianaufrufe672dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %3.20%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.70%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag6729240.73×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)3.20%3.62%0.88×
Interaktionsrate0.70%1.52%0.46×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

82227 Aug
9741 Sep
19
2.4K
18
24
69616 Sep
64918 Sep

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.97%27 Aug
1.23%1 Sep
5.26%
1.54%
0.00%
0.00%
0.43%16 Sep
0.31%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes79.7%55 in total
Reposts7.2%5 in total
Replies4.3%3 in total
Bookmarks8.7%6 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten