tweetindex
DE

Charles Guillemet ✓

@P3b7_ · Paris, France · joined 16 Sep 2018

CTO at @ledger. Busy securing the blockchain revolution. Cryptography, (Hw) Security, Tech, Blockchain. Previously built the Donjon (@DonjonLedger)

45 745Followers
302Following
5 133Posts total
1.2MViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

No quantum computer was involved here... 17.4K views · 86 likes · 4 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
As I said the other day: reproducing an already-patched bug is not "hacking Ledger." What this thread describes is a vulnerability in an outdated version of the Ethereum app. It was identified through our security process and fixed in Ethereum app 1.22.2, released August 13, 20.8K views · 150 likes · 20 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ @DonjonLedger Hi Charles, can you point me towards the post from two weeks ago informing users of the issue and notifying them to make sure their devices are kept up to date please 4.4K views · 41 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ @DonjonLedger Also this info should have been posted on the main ledger account so people know to update. There is zero mention of it there. You have one job - security and you keep fucking it up. Not everyone follows the feed of every team member. 4.6K views · 52 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ @DonjonLedger Thanks for the update Charles but you and @_pgauthier need to stop AI generating all your posts 9.6K views · 66 likes · 0 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
There's some FUD circulating about Ledger signers, pushed by a "smart contract security" company claiming a vulnerability in the Ledger Ethereum app. There was a bug concerning certain clear signing flows. It was found by the @DonjonLedger using their AI-powered vulnerability 250.3K views · 589 likes · 109 reposts · 66 replies Open on X →
You can now sell AI tokens on https://t.co/vZAX4FD1i8 against USDC. At first I thought it was a nice idea. Remember when hackers and insiders were running Bitcoin miners on company infrastructure? Same scheme, new substrate. Except now the compute being siphoned isn't hashing 3.6K views · 17 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
The return of Stuxnet! Not developed by nation state burning their best 0-day, but a few prompts to Kimi R3... 🫠 4.3K views · 11 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ i can hear @PatrickAlphaC’s voice from here 1K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ The key you posted is from here, but the comment explicitly says "make all docker use same enclave.key -- we could have better way to manage this secret, although this one is meaningless and just acts like a id." https://t.co/1ppxMGxXYj https://t.co/WqrCIh1Ysh
6.2K views · 16 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ @zooko vibe coding is a hell of a drug 4.4K views · 43 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
🚨Taiko drained for ~$1.7M. Root cause: a private key committed to a public GitHub repo. enclave-key.pem, the RSA key used to sign all of Taiko's SGX enclaves, sat in the public taikoxyz/raiko repo. That key is the whole trust model. The attacker derived MrSigner from the https:
189.4K views · 349 likes · 49 reposts · 39 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/2vkUYFpbjC 78.1K views · 125 likes · 22 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
If you use a Ledger or hardware wallet with clear signing, you are not at risk. My tweet above is warning people who do not use a hardware wallet with clear signing of the risk. Always review every transaction before you sign. 435.3K views · 2.1K likes · 252 reposts · 189 replies Open on X →
@P3b7_ How You Lose Your Funds The malware uses two sophisticated methods: - Clipboard Hijacking: When you paste a wallet address, it stealthily swaps it with an attacker's address that is visually similar to the real one, making it extremely hard to spot the difference. - Tran 209.5K views · 1.1K likes · 184 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

8 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe7 103dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %15.53%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %0.67%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag7 1039247.69×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)15.53%3.62%4.29×
Interaktionsrate0.67%1.52%0.44×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

435.3K8 Sep
78.1K24 Mar
189.4K22 Jun
4.4K
6.2K
1K
4.3K19 Aug
3.6K20 Aug
250.3K23 Aug
9.6K
4.6K
4.4K
20.8K27 Aug
17.4K3 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.58%8 Sep
0.22%24 Mar
0.26%22 Jun
0.99%
0.29%
1.15%
0.35%19 Aug
0.59%20 Aug
0.32%23 Aug
0.75%
1.18%
1.07%
0.94%27 Aug
0.55%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes69.1%4 737 in total
Reposts9.4%645 in total
Replies5.9%405 in total
Quotes1.7%115 in total
Bookmarks14.0%958 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten