PNASNews

@PNASNews · Washington, DC · joined 28 Feb 2011

Cutting-edge news & reports from PNAS, one of the world's most-cited scientific journals, sibling journal of @PNASNexus & an official journal of @theNASciences.

183 986Followers

1 241Following

19 139Posts total

38.3KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

PNASNews@PNASNews5 Sep

An analysis of tree-ring data from 1,200 fire-scarred trees suggests that the area of dry-conifer forest in New Mexico’s Jemez Mountains could be halved by 2055—a loss caused by mismanagement and wildfires made more destructive by climate change. In PNAS: https://t.co/wDMqitSO1Q 2.8K views · 9 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews4 Sep

Meet Dr. Hidde Ploegh of Boston Children’s Hospital, a @PNASNexus Associate Editor and distinguished NAS member who brings expertise in cellular and molecular medicine to the journal’s editorial board. Explore the full Editorial Board: https://t.co/HEZTAQKxRG https://t.co/EDisCG 2.7K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews4 Sep

Honoring David Botstein, a pioneering geneticist and passionate educator who helped develop restriction fragment length polymorphisms as landmarks for the locations of genes in the human genome. Read the PNAS Retrospective: https://t.co/Z0C69QtcBC https://t.co/86SjShDN1C 3.7K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews4 Sep

More than 100 pregnant women in Ecuador adopted a diet based on studies of nutrition in human evolution. Compared with controls, their babies had increased growth in subcortical brain regions linked to motor control, cognition, and signal transmission. https://t.co/7skH75xtk6 htt 4.1K views · 19 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews2 Sep

Materials under compression will eventually break, bend, or buckle. In some applications, this can be a feature rather than a bug. A study of controlled propagation of buckling events explores the possibilities. In @PNASNexus: https://t.co/7PuyECsBkp https://t.co/ld6FX4fBqj 5.9K views · 11 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews2 Sep

A study of blood and fecal samples from dogs chronicles extensive changes to the gut microbiome after switching to a low- carbohydrate diet. The specific changes depended on whether carbohydrate energy was replaced with fat or protein. In PNAS: https://t.co/iNZ0xWlgnW https://t.c 5.9K views · 22 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews1 Sep

PNAS 2027 subscription rates are here! Get year-round access to high-impact research, Special Features, and 32,000+ pages of groundbreaking science, along with the full archive dating back to 1915. Subscribe today: https://t.co/Bom4MgSnOT https://t.co/3rtLt6BqZO 3.4K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews1 Sep

A review discusses what is lost when assisted reproductive procedures bypass the fallopian tube. The fallopian tube is an active regulator of preimplantation embryonic development and a biosensor of embryo quality. In @PNASNexus: https://t.co/3L1yA8I0kv https://t.co/nQPxDyE2EW 5.3K views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

PNASNews@PNASNews27 Aug

In this issue: Lyme disease ecology in New York, evidence that a painted plaque suggests an Austronesian tradition preceded Neolithic pottery, and a stem cell-derived model of neurodegenerative retinal diseases. In PNAS: https://t.co/tFwkWfKG4Q https://t.co/rrlAzVPjA8 4.4K views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 100K–1M Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe4 139dieses Konto5 983Median für 100K–1M

Reichweite, %2.25%dieses Konto1.49%Median für 100K–1M

Interaktion, %0.21%dieses Konto0.93%Median für 100K–1M

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 100K–1M	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	4 139	5 983	0.69×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	2.25%	1.49%	1.51×
Interaktionsrate	0.21%	0.93%	0.22×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.4K27 Aug

5.3K1 Sep

3.4K

5.9K2 Sep

5.9K

4.1K4 Sep

3.7K

2.7K

2.8K5 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.16%27 Aug

0.21%1 Sep

0.06%

0.49%2 Sep

0.22%

0.63%4 Sep

0.19%

0.11%

0.49%5 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes62.9%88 in total

Reposts16.4%23 in total

Quotes0.7%1 in total

Bookmarks20.0%28 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten