Matt Cooperberg ✓

@dr_coops · San Francisco, CA · joined 25 Sep 2010

Urologic oncology & epi, focus on #prostatecancer @UCSFcancer @UCSFurology. GU Chief @SFVAMC. All views strictly personal. RT≠E. #🟦

11 367Followers

1 917Following

11 625Posts total

48.2KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops6 Sep

It was a huge honor to represent @BJUIjournal at the #UAA26 meeting in Manila. My first time in the Philippines: wonderful hospitality, fantastic food, and the @pua_org “Mr. and Ms. Urology” pageant is unlike anything I’ve ever seen! https://t.co/7tMWyWqSq1

0:32

2.4K views · 38 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops25 Aug

Why all-surgery M&M is a monthly affirmation that urology is a great life-choice 😬 😁 https://t.co/gqIUQULBdL

3.4K views · 16 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops18 Aug

For Early Prostate Cancer ‘Active Surveillance’ Is Now #1 Choice https://t.co/kMDqKn3JlE @UCSFCancer @UCSFHospitals @UCSFUrology 2.3K views · 24 likes · 5 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops16 Aug

https://t.co/OzXsP3anND @UCSFUrology @UCSFCancer 1.6K views · 8 likes · 2 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops13 Aug

oof - editorial was led by Basourakos; Consenza led focal tx NCDB paper. Can't seem to edit a threaded post! 830 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops13 Aug

Editorial from Consenza, @DrSpratticus, @jeshoag https://t.co/46esO6x18g is well-titled but and raises some fair points but also reflects pretty strong/unsurprising biases. Focal tx will find its place, and is hardly unique in being over/underused. 2K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops13 Aug

Finally, Ellis et al report NRG-GU005: SBRT compared to IMRT caused less toxicity but slightly worse biochemical control; no difference in OS. https://t.co/exp9qY1AyN Excellent and nuanced editorial from Liauw and Lee here: https://t.co/migc5ApVv8 3.1K views · 27 likes · 10 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops13 Aug

Big week for #prostatecancer news @JAMA_current! First @grace_syl for PROFOUND-VET: use of #activesurveillance is now 93% for low-risk disease and 62% for favorable intermediate. Huge news and proof that @VeteransHealth is leading the way in this area. https://t.co/lESYZqmbTp

16.1K views · 96 likes · 36 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Matt Cooperberg ✓@dr_coops13 Aug

From NCDB, @qdtrinh @daviesbj @Putnam_Cole et al showed AS/WW is up to 80%! They raise alarms re: focal tx use patterns—this should not be done for low-risk, but NCCN risk groups are not the right way to determine whether focal is appropriate for others. https://t.co/22RUQfCmeY

16.4K views · 19 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

9 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe2 380dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %20.94%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.62%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	2 380	924	2.58×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	20.94%	3.62%	5.78×
Interaktionsrate	0.62%	1.52%	0.41×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

16.4K13 Aug

16.1K

3.1K

830

1.6K16 Aug

2.3K18 Aug

3.4K25 Aug

2.4K6 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.16%13 Aug

0.86%

1.25%

0.55%

0.12%

0.62%16 Aug

1.26%18 Aug

0.50%25 Aug

1.72%6 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes65.7%237 in total

Reposts16.1%58 in total

Replies3.0%11 in total

Quotes1.9%7 in total

Bookmarks13.3%48 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten