Ethan J. Weiss ✓

@ethanjweiss · San Francisco · joined 07 Dec 2009

Scientist (metabolism) & Cardiologist (prevention); Latest @Marea_tx

63 389Followers

2 070Following

66 940Posts total

118.6KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss4 Sep

Also worth noting that this is another win for the “it’s the ApoB stupid” crowd. Getting harder and harder to argue against that these days when it comes to ASCVD 2.1K views · 21 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss4 Sep

@ethanjweiss Agree with those 3 possibilities. Also possible that the majority of risk is in the far tail of lp(a) distribution and those with less severe elevations diluted the signal. 1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss4 Sep

Also this could be 1) that this was the worst of the Lp(a) directed therapies or it could be 2) that showing an improvement in ASCVD risk by lowering Lp(a) in patients aggressively treated to very low LDLc levels is not possible or 3) genetics were wrong and liek HDL, Lp(a) is a 22.1K views · 114 likes · 7 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss4 Sep

I guess it is possible to be surprised and not at all surprised at the same time... wow 2 big fails in a row on genetically validated CV targets 34.3K views · 125 likes · 15 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss4 Sep

Today, with our partner @Novartis , we announced topline results from the Phase 3 Lp(a)HORIZON clinical trial in patients with cardiovascular disease and elevated levels of Lp(a). Learn more: https://t.co/2fMZMptOuz https://t.co/PON8ng8ihd 30.1K views · 18 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss31 Aug

Ok I just tried this and wow! https://t.co/oOA1kYuT2g 7.6K views · 43 likes · 4 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss29 Aug

Wow this makes sense! (And wow did I hate the type 1, 2, etc.) 3.9K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss26 Aug

@ethanjweiss I’ve worked for years on my midwest nice but this conversation is really testing me. Big pivot for @DGlaucomflecken after the private equity folks told him to cease and desist. Physician scientists are a soft target I guess. 367 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss25 Aug

@ethanjweiss Touché 73 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss25 Aug

@ethanjweiss Completely agree 👍 235 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss25 Aug

Well I have thoughts as well (I know, shocking). I do think two things can be true: 1) scientific inquiry can be a foundational part of training for some students/trainees with interest/aptitude, and I believe it makes for better scientists and better clinicians; and 2) the 7.8K views · 18 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss25 Aug

@ethanjweiss @DGlaucomflecken 😂 Love his input More on a generalized discussion happening on research during medical training No right answers Just sharing my own personal experience and views 6.3K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss24 Aug

In the old days, we'd have read this news in the actual paper (tomorrow) and then the motivated would go to the library to look it up... https://t.co/VzcW3S7Ke2 2.6K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Ethan J. Weiss ✓@ethanjweiss11 Mar 2017

"This is what happens when people become attached to a theory. They fit the evidence to the theory rather than the theory to the evidence... 0 views · 527 likes · 77 reposts · 45 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

13 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe3 907dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %6.16%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.43%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	3 907	924	4.23×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	6.16%	3.62%	1.70×
Interaktionsrate	0.43%	1.52%	0.28×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

2.6K24 Aug

6.3K25 Aug

7.8K

235

36726 Aug

3.9K29 Aug

7.6K31 Aug

30.1K4 Sep

34.3K

22.1K

1.1K

2.1K

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.11%24 Aug

0.05%25 Aug

0.31%

0.43%

1.37%

1.09%26 Aug

0.38%29 Aug

0.75%31 Aug

0.09%4 Sep

0.46%

0.67%

0.36%

1.20%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes66.7%364 in total

Reposts6.0%33 in total

Replies9.5%52 in total

Quotes3.7%20 in total

Bookmarks14.1%77 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten