Jonatan Pallesen ✓

@jonatanpallesen · Copenhagen, Denmark · joined 27 Oct 2015

Analyses and visualizations. PhD in statistical genetics. Westernist. Less mass immigration, more births.

68 083Followers

1 060Following

31 176Posts total

298.4KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Jonatan Pallesen ✓@jonatanpallesen3 Sep

The Lindsay Clancy discourse is quite poor. It seems to me that the anti-Lindsay Clancy commentators are either: 1. Denying that people can be deemed not criminally guilty by reason of insanity or psychosis. or 2. Claiming that it is not possible that Lindsay Clancy 7.6K views · 68 likes · 4 reposts · 61 replies Open on X →

Jonatan Pallesen ✓@jonatanpallesen3 Sep

One of the problems with the mass import of low-skilled Muslim workforce, is that many of the professions where they find work (such as taxi driver, elder care worker, and so on) are positions where they have a lot of opportunity to rape. And they are on average extremely https:/ 23K views · 1.5K likes · 161 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Jonatan Pallesen ✓@jonatanpallesen3 Sep

This is a good time to stop and consider the fact that scientific journals are not needed anymore. Scientific journals today do two main things for society: (1) Take payment for work other people have done, and (2) Prevent a large share of people from accessing the research. 205.5K views · 1.1K likes · 141 reposts · 43 replies Open on X →

Jonatan Pallesen ✓@jonatanpallesen3 Sep

The Arday scandal is not mainly about Arday, or even about his hiring by Cambridge. It is about the widespread post-truth reaction to it, including from many establishment figures and institutions. The arguments establishing his plagiarism and confabulations were obvious from 31.4K views · 837 likes · 100 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →

Jonatan Pallesen ✓@jonatanpallesen2 Sep

Nature thinks that Cambridge must be scrutinized for investigating Arday. This investigation “risked adding to the impression that he had done something wrong.” Nature is possibly the most prestigious scientific journal, and they are writing this nonsense. The scientific world h 30.9K views · 1.7K likes · 207 reposts · 48 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

5 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit über das eigene Publikum hinaus gezeigt, und es reagiert.

Medianaufrufe30 937dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %45.44%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %3.07%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	30 937	924	33.5×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	45.44%	3.62%	12.6×
Interaktionsrate	3.07%	1.52%	2.02×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

30.9K2 Sep

31.4K3 Sep

205.5K

23K

7.6K

Last 5 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

6.23%2 Sep

3.07%3 Sep

0.64%

7.13%

1.75%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes80.4%5 134 in total

Reposts9.6%613 in total

Replies2.9%184 in total

Quotes0.6%36 in total

Bookmarks6.6%421 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten