karminski-牙医 ✓

@karminski3 · Asia/Beijing · joined 08 Dec 2018

A coder, road bike rider, server fortune teller, electronic waste collector, co-founder of KCORES, ex-director at IllaSoft, KingsoftOffice, Juejin.

39 668Followers

1 561Following

4 849Posts total

82.2KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski323 Sep

Grok-4.7-high 用了一天了，感觉打不过 GPT-5.6-sol-medium. 写了好多垃圾代码😭 体验下来 oneshot还行, 工程项目就拉了... 主要在视野窄, 以及代码直觉和经验上, 总是会漏掉边界条件. 最简单的复现方法可以是写一个分布式锁. 应该分分钟就死锁了. 然后怎么修都修不好. 13.1K views · 60 likes · 1 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski323 Sep

@karminski3 a ÷回退很经常，但是降智的情况远远少于 OpenAI。 466 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

@karminski3 把怀疑说出来还给依据，这种评测比一句“强”有用得多。 515 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

肝不动了....GPT的几个和后端/Agent性能测试明天再说吧..... 6.3K views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

@karminski3 效率也太高了！你不睡觉的吗😳 7.5K views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

给大家带来claude opus 5.5 的前端测试结果. 直接说结论, 我怀疑现在opus 5.5就是 fable 5.1 的量化版或者自家蒸馏版, 可以直接看我的视频, 几乎看不出两个模型实现细节上的差别. 而且模型继承了Anthropic一贯的优良特点, 一个字, 稳, 6次抽卡6次全都是这个质量. 除此之外我测试时很明显 opus 5.5 https://t.co/Jm1lKMiftY

1:11

34.7K views · 104 likes · 3 reposts · 24 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

给大家带来小米 MiMo-v2.6-pro 的测试速报! 简单来讲, 这次不愧是直播RL带来的效果, AgenticCoding 能力提升明显, 之前的 MiMo-v2.5-Pro 在我的向量数据库测试中得分只有2505, 而这次直接翻了3倍, 得分来到了7810. 与 Claude Fable-5 分数接近了. 而且算法也进化为了单图HNSW分层近邻图(M=16/M0=28) https://t.co/GJL62rCzm1

1:10

11.3K views · 65 likes · 5 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →

karminski-牙医 ✓@karminski322 Sep

卧槽5-10T??? 8.2K views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

8 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe7 852dieses Konto1 004Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %19.79%dieses Konto3.97%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.34%dieses Konto1.55%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	7 852	1 004	7.82×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	19.79%	3.97%	4.99×
Interaktionsrate	0.34%	1.55%	0.22×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.2K22 Sep

11.3K

34.7K

7.5K

6.3K

515

46623 Sep

13.1K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.15%22 Sep

0.74%

0.38%

0.04%

0.30%

0.19%

0.86%23 Sep

0.57%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes66.4%261 in total

Reposts2.5%10 in total

Replies14.0%55 in total

Quotes0.8%3 in total

Bookmarks16.3%64 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten