Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓

@lwastuargo · 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 1000 mentee · joined 27 Mar 2011

Professional social climber 🪜 (Closed) 100% guarantee career booster 📈: https://t.co/DuZShvk1Ct

27 828Followers

222Following

6 548Posts total

381.1KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo21 Sep

Melihat Jev, model yang specialized buat classification, makin kaget sama akurasi dari ramalan sendiri Mungkin harus mulai ngeramal saham, bikin kelas, jadi media cuci2 dari sana Oh wait 23.6K views · 378 likes · 21 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo15 Sep

Paiton, aka Infinity Castle 3.1K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo15 Sep

The Palantir Pace https://t.co/6DcyUsmUFk

16.5K views · 491 likes · 42 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo14 Sep

Pingin membangun citra sejelek dan serendah mungkin sedemikian sehingga kalo saya blunder reaksi orang bakal "Oh ya, makes sense. Next" 13.1K views · 239 likes · 21 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo13 Sep

Codex reset terus jadi dapet perbandingan sama DS 4.1 setelah penggunaan bbrp hari saat Codex mati Terus sedih, soalnya setup harnessku jauh lebih bagus pake DS daripada Codex 62 tiket beres dalam 6 jam by Deepseek 4.1 Flash (targetnya beres 200/day). GPT dengan berbagai https:

16.8K views · 174 likes · 6 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo11 Sep

Kenapa 13 akun Codex dibandingkan Deepseek 4.1 Sudha dibenchmark, akun Codex habis $2600 sebulan. Untuk same workload buat task yang sama Deepseek + Deepseek Harness bakal habis $6000 sebulan Karena saya bukan kaum mendang-mending, jadi sekarang habis deh itu $8600 sebulan 26.4K views · 72 likes · 4 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo8 Aug

🚚 Jadi Gogo bikin 400+ commit per hari itu ngapain sih? 💩 And is that shit commits? 💾 Tiap save file di-commit? 📊 Emang ada hasilnya? Awal 2025, semua orang masih pada pake Cursor/Windsurf. AI ngoding, kita review. Kita liatin itu kode satu-satu. Apapun yang masuk ke main https:

67.8K views · 1K likes · 141 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo14 Mar

Relevant tweet https://t.co/I0tOC61JLU 7K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo14 Mar

@lwastuargo "Menurut Pak CTO ini aku salah. Anthropic/OpenAI/Gemini itu sama aja, ga ada yang melakukan specialization." Tahun berapa itu mas? Mungkin masih awal banget baru menetas? #berusahapositipthinking 3.5K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo14 Mar

And kinda makes me think: in a world where Coding is All You Need, harusnya software engineer merasa kuat, bukan merasa lemah dan takut dipecat 9.6K views · 108 likes · 8 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo14 Mar

Sempet di suatu tech talk aku dicibir seorang CTO ketika beropini begini: Anthropic dan OpenAI/Gemini sama2 mau mencapai AGI. Tapi caranya beda OpenAI/Gemini mencoba mencapai AGI dengan mencoba semuanya. Going wide. Voice agent, image generation, writing, research, coding, 117.5K views · 802 likes · 76 reposts · 20 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo13 Mar

kalo mau build dari awal, mending xAI jangan fokus ke coding agent, tapi ke agent yang maintain interpersonal relationship ke human. misal sales agent -> distribute ads to the right people storyteller agent -> distribute writer/news source/journalist to the right group 59.8K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Gogo | Dota for Toxicity ✓@lwastuargo31 Jan

Bumi ternyata hasil vibe coding 16.3K views · 43 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird mehr Menschen gezeigt als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe16 819dieses Konto996Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %60.44%dieses Konto3.84%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %1.71%dieses Konto1.51%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	16 819	996	16.9×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	60.44%	3.84%	15.7×
Interaktionsrate	1.71%	1.51%	1.13×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

16.3K31 Jan

59.8K13 Mar

117.5K14 Mar

9.6K

3.5K

67.8K8 Aug

26.4K11 Sep

16.8K13 Sep

13.1K14 Sep

16.5K15 Sep

3.1K

23.6K21 Sep

Last 13 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.34%31 Jan

0.03%13 Mar

0.77%14 Mar

1.30%

0.14%

0.17%

1.78%8 Aug

0.32%11 Sep

1.14%13 Sep

2.08%14 Sep

3.31%15 Sep

0.26%

1.71%21 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes62.5%3 364 in total

Reposts6.0%324 in total

Replies1.8%99 in total

Quotes0.8%44 in total

Bookmarks28.8%1 552 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten