Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓

@octonion · Lexington, KY · joined 27 Sep 2009

Data science and optimization. Ex-San Diego Padres, Detroit Tigers, Yankees, Arsenal, Houston Rockets. Google Foobar winner. He/him. sabermetrics@gmail.com

22 804Followers

7 170Following

167 932Posts total

11.7KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion10 Sep

Messier proof, but two atoms also suffice for all real t ≥ 1. Always worth the time to check an obvious relaxation. 750 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion9 Sep

If the money is there, they do not care. Applies to every industry throughout human history. 1.6K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion9 Sep

Two atom sizes suffice for integer t≥1. One of those tricky little problems that just nags at you. Discussed within Theorem 1 (which proves four atom sizes suffice): The Expected Missing Mass under an Entropy Constraint (2017) https://t.co/wiuSNQMpzJ 1.3K views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion9 Sep

OpenAI and your unpublished research. https://t.co/AaGjvH36WV

1K views · 26 likes · 3 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion3 Sep

@octonion Nice! 376 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion3 Sep

This result has also been formalized. 716 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Christopher D. Long 🇺🇦🏳️‍🌈🌹 ✓@octonion3 Sep

The explicit counterexample to the rank-two Poisson conjecture is now on arXiv. If true, it would have implied the planar Jacobian conjecture, so this removes one of the remaining routes. An Explicit Counterexample to the Rank-Two Poisson Conjecture https://t.co/EuNM2h0Ktq 5.9K views · 57 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

7 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe1 010dieses Konto949Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %4.43%dieses Konto3.31%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.70%dieses Konto1.88%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	1 010	949	1.06×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	4.43%	3.31%	1.34×
Interaktionsrate	0.70%	1.88%	0.37×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5.9K3 Sep

716

376

1K9 Sep

1.3K

1.6K

75010 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.06%3 Sep

0.70%

0.27%

3.37%9 Sep

0.23%

0.74%

0.27%10 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.88%.

What the audience does

Likes72.0%103 in total

Reposts4.2%6 in total

Replies7.7%11 in total

Bookmarks16.1%23 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten