tweetindex
DE

Martin Odersky

@odersky · joined 30 Nov 2008

lead designer of Scala

47 404Followers
243Following
1 308Posts total
69KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Liked this article from Galois: https://t.co/iYaoG3Qi9P. Great food for thought about the power and limits of formal specifications. 6.7K views · 62 likes · 10 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
New blog post that describes the ideas behind our award-winning paper on securing AI agents: https://t.co/Kj0kmZ1JBW 8.9K views · 97 likes · 17 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Very happy that our work on securing agents with tracked capabilities got best paper award at #cais2026! https://t.co/JW4WkxKlDm 5.1K views · 71 likes · 24 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
For people who prefer listening to reading, there's a notebookLM that describes the paper which is actually pretty decent. https://t.co/vKRe6bvfyK 3.7K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
How can we ensure critical safety properties of AI agents? Like, no API keys leaked, no prompt injection, no data loss? It's a hard question which will require fundamentally rethinking the way we build modular software. We have an answer in our paper "Tracking Capabilities for 28.6K views · 115 likes · 35 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@odersky @scala_lang nice avatar 158 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@odersky Trust in agents is a function of authorization scope. The tighter the permission surface, the more predictable the failure mode. Most trust frameworks focus on model behavior. The real lever is what the agent is allowed to touch — not what it's likely to do. 241 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Just gave a my talk: "How Can We Trust Our Agents?" at Scalar conference. Slides: https://t.co/5OR0NJzrg2 10.7K views · 66 likes · 19 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
There's a new paper out from Martin Odersky and his team on applying Scala Capabilities to AI agents. I have to admit, it's a really fascinating use case! Listen for yourself 👇 (disclaimer: the podcast is generated by NotebookLM, but give it a shot - it's very well done!) https:
13:06
5K views · 31 likes · 3 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

2 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird mehr Menschen gezeigt als Konten gleicher Größe.

Medianaufrufe7 818dieses Konto966Median für 10K–100K
Reichweite, %16.49%dieses Konto3.66%Median für 10K–100K
Interaktion, %1.19%dieses Konto1.51%Median für 10K–100K
KennzahlDieses KontoMedian für 10K–100KVerhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag7 8189668.09×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)16.49%3.66%4.51×
Interaktionsrate1.19%1.51%0.79×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe →   Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen →   Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

5K16 Mar
10.7K26 Mar
241
158
28.6K20 May
3.7K
5.1K29 May
8.9K27 Jul
6.7K2 Sep

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.76%16 Mar
0.82%26 Mar
0.83%
0.63%
0.53%20 May
0.27%
1.88%29 May
1.30%27 Jul
1.09%2 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.51%.

What the audience does

Likes53.5%454 in total
Reposts12.8%109 in total
Replies1.2%10 in total
Bookmarks32.5%276 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Ähnliche Konten