Lionel Page ✓

@page_eco · Brisbane · joined 06 Jan 2017

Professor UQ. Director @UQCUBES. Editor JESA. Tweets on economics, psychology, & society. Book: Optimally Irrational, https://t.co/6gTPWKTvih

40 077Followers

516Following

11 002Posts total

110.5KViews on collected posts

Neueste Beiträge

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco9 Sep

“the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.” I tend to be fairly optimistic about the upsides of AI, but this is concerning. Unfortunately the 2.5K views · 12 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco8 Sep

This is bad on OpenAI's part. AI companies need to have very clear and transparent rules about how they use researchers' input in order to respect intellectual property and properly attribute credit for findings. If not, they will not be trusted as tools for research. 1.7K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco8 Sep

AI will save us a lot of time wasted on fake controversies. https://t.co/gBYfVLJSUB

1.8K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco8 Sep

AI models are transforming access to knowledge. By giving everyone an expert assistant, they will improve the prevalence of rigorous takes in public debates while limiting experts' ability to use their authority beyond what their evidence warrants. https://t.co/wn9RSDkK1R https:

2.2K views · 18 likes · 5 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco3 Sep

I agree. The conscious experience is part of the information processing. Once the function of consciousness is explained, there is no mystery left. 2.1K views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →

Lionel Page ✓@page_eco2 Sep

Once you explain the functions of consciousness, is the question of "what is consciousness" solved? Floris de Lange supports Daniel Dennett's materialist and functionalist view. Is there anything more "mysterious" or perhaps unscientific to consciousness? https://t.co/SaIsUb8ADJ

1:02

100.2K views · 254 likes · 15 reposts · 32 replies Open on X →

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

6 Beiträge aus den letzten 90 Tagen, verglichen mit der Größenklasse 10K–100K Follower. wird weit gezeigt, aber nur wenige dieser Zuschauer reagieren.

Medianaufrufe2 145dieses Konto924Median für 10K–100K

Reichweite, %5.35%dieses Konto3.62%Median für 10K–100K

Interaktion, %0.46%dieses Konto1.52%Median für 10K–100K

Kennzahl	Dieses Konto	Median für 10K–100K	Verhältnis
Medianaufrufe pro Beitrag	2 145	924	2.32×
Reichweite (Aufrufe ÷ Follower)	5.35%	3.62%	1.48×
Interaktionsrate	0.46%	1.52%	0.30×

Weitere Konten dieser Größe → Mit einem anderen Konto vergleichen → Wie diese Vergleichswerte entstehen →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

100.2K2 Sep

2.1K3 Sep

2.2K8 Sep

1.8K

1.7K

2.5K9 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.30%2 Sep

0.57%3 Sep

1.19%8 Sep

0.33%

0.35%

0.56%9 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes78.0%298 in total

Reposts6.0%23 in total

Replies11.5%44 in total

Bookmarks4.5%17 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Neueste Beiträge

Im Vergleich zu Konten gleicher Größe

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Ähnliche Konten