Phil Metzger ✓
@DrPhiltill · Orlando, FL · joined 10 Dec 2012
Director, Stephen W. Hawking Center for Microgravity Research & Education @UCF. Prev: co-founder NASA KSC Swamp Works. Space Mining. Space Settlement. Science.
100 979Followers
657Following
75 074Posts total
753.7KViews on collected posts
Últimas publicaciones
Buscando publicaciones nuevas…
The Moon is Earth’s attic where the family history is stored. One of the many reasons we need to get back to the Moon!
4.6K views · 118 likes
· 16 reposts · 3 replies
Open on X →
The Moon may keep an 80–100 million-year notebook of exploding stars. A new Physical Review Letters model of impact gardening shows how supernova debris gets buried and mixed in lunar regolith, and where Artemis deep cores should look.
https://t.co/4lxsJMenuH https://t.co/NAmPtr
6K views · 21 likes
· 3 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
Wow, this is a great result from the @JAXA_en Hayabusa2 mission, which returned samples from asteroid Ryugu!The parent body of Ryugu (before it was shattered) had liquid brine under its surface that included Nitrogen-bearing molecules. This helps explain how N was delivered to
3.8K views · 104 likes
· 15 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
On the path to lunar surface nuclear power by 2030: “Antares Selected for $161M Strategic Breakthrough Award to Demonstrate Space Reactor.”
https://t.co/7ykMwJY6T9
3.6K views · 89 likes
· 17 reposts · 4 replies
Open on X →
U.S. seeks broader space cooperation with India: asks India to be a partner in the Artemis Moon base and encourages commercial space partnerships.
https://t.co/YwTj5bwHiR
4K views · 16 likes
· 3 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
@DrPhiltill Hey Phil, why are you purposely dodging questions from national security expert @MvonRen regarding your debunking efforts on UAP?
As a Director, Stephen W. Hawking Center for Microgravity Research & Education at @UCF, you certainly seem to be completely ignoring scie
100 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
@DrPhiltill So much fun stuff to sift through...👍
70 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@DrPhiltill I haven't seen the first two yet, nor read through the threads presented here, but based on all the headlines in this thread I'm looking forward to looking at all of them.
49 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
@DrPhiltill This is amazing. Thank you for sharing all this!
623 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Three collections of threads from over the years, sorted by how interesting (IMO). I hope you enjoy!
1. IMO, the best 🧵s.
https://t.co/PGIE3r1XqL
2. The 2nd best set.
https://t.co/Ygvlbezy0H
3. The 3rd best.
https://t.co/VMkJf4xgCd https://t.co/fuy7U8dJbI
308.2K views · 393 likes
· 82 reposts · 28 replies
Open on X →
35/ Thruster blast tests on lunar landing pad concepts.
2.5K views · 8 likes
· 1 reposts · 0 replies
Open on X →
34/ Classification is true science, and not insulting other cultures when naming planets.
2.6K views · 3 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
33/ Lost access to the Apollo data tapes, and what we did instead.
328 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
32/ Why (we think) we kept the space shuttle launch pad tanks full for 40 years.
344 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
27/ How I changed from skeptic to cautious believer in SBSP.
323 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
26/ Why taxonomy matters: both for cognitive processes and for educating the public.
324 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
25/ Some initial work on the economics of lunar water mining.
294 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
24/ Critique of a critique of doing Mars missions. Geopolitics, technical competence, and more.
293 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
22/ Why recent criticism of SBSP is not valid.
339 views · 0 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
21/ We are at a tipping point in moving civilization into space.
310 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
20/ Easter egg hidden in Space Station test software.
299 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
19/ Art on the old CIA listening station in Berlin.
470 views · 1 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
14/ Searching for a Space Shuttle Columbia part in canyon lands compared to the Chinese spy balloon.
397 views · 5 likes
· 0 reposts · 2 replies
Open on X →
13/ How many planets in our Solar System…450? And why that matters.
377 views · 6 likes
· 1 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
11/ Translating into modern English an inspirational quote from the 1600s about flying to the Moon.
502 views · 4 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
10/ How technology creates wealth so hoarders become poor.
448 views · 4 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
9/ Critique of the Grabby Civilization model. (BTW, I’m still refining a critique of the Doomsday Argument and the Self-Sampling Assumption, which underly this.)
478 views · 2 likes
· 0 reposts · 1 replies
Open on X →
Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño
6 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.
Visualizaciones medianas3 858esta cuenta6 369mediana de 100K–1M
Alcance, %3.82%esta cuenta1.92%mediana de 100K–1M
Interacción, %3.00%esta cuenta1.15%mediana de 100K–1M
| Métrica | Esta cuenta | Mediana de 100K–1M | Proporción |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visualizaciones medianas por publicación | 3 858 | 6 369 | 0.61× |
| Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores) | 3.82% | 1.92% | 1.99× |
| Tasa de interacción | 3.00% | 1.15% | 2.62× |
Otras cuentas de este rango → Comparar con otra cuenta → Cómo se construyen estas referencias →
Growth & engagement
How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.
Views per post
34411 Nov
328
2.6K
2.5K
308.2K
623
49
7024 Jan
1001 Jul
4K14 Sep
3.6K
3.8K
6K
4.6K
Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.
Engagement rate per post
0.58%11 Nov
0.30%
0.19%
0.36%
0.16%
0.48%
2.04%
2.86%24 Jan
3.00%1 Jul
0.53%14 Sep
3.05%
3.23%
0.43%
3.00%
Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.15%.
What the audience does
Likes62.7%795 in total
Reposts11.0%139 in total
Replies5.0%63 in total
Bookmarks21.4%271 in total
Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.
The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.
Cuentas similares
대한민국 외교부 MOFA_KR ✓
@mofa_kr
201.9K followers
· 21.6K posts
Bundesministerium des Innern
@BMI_Bund
201.9K followers
· 27.8K posts
伊藤暢達/Masahiro Ito
@adsk4
201.9K followers
· 103K posts
Ashlee Vance ✓
@ashleevance
201.9K followers
· 12.6K posts
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil ✓
@ivan_8848
201.9K followers
· 170.7K posts
Yedi23haber ✓
@Yedi23haber
201.9K followers
· 5.3K posts
سید عزت الله ضرغامی ✓
@Zarghami_ez
201.8K followers
· 1.9K posts
Ron MacLean ✓
@Ron_MacLean
201.8K followers
· 666 posts