Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 ✓

@InfraHaz · joined 15 Feb 2021

The Undefeated Tankie Warlord and Executive Chairman of @ACPMain

119 312Followers

95Following

13 783Posts total

3.9MViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

Retarded boomer nonsense 34.4K views · 963 likes · 184 reposts · 57 replies 03 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

https://t.co/QdAB6wYnL9 19.4K views · 1K likes · 213 reposts · 36 replies 02 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

The reason many mothers hate their own babies is because in the AI age, hatred of otherness takes the extreme form of hatred of babies. Babies are the ultimate strangers and barbarians. They are not “civilized” or immediately familiar. They don’t “validate” you or exist “for 28.1K views · 817 likes · 185 reposts · 59 replies 01 Sep 2026 · Open on X →

Every time USA bombs Iran after failed negotiations: https://t.co/q2Wt6RWtla 10.4K views · 597 likes · 150 reposts · 26 replies 30 Aug 2026 · Open on X →

@InfraHaz 🤡 4K views · 156 likes · 4 reposts · 7 replies 13 Oct 2023 · Open on X →

§208 Only out of this, may a people regain meaning after the catastrophe that is to come. 29.8K views · 167 likes · 10 reposts · 39 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§206 It is now time to finally realize the limit of modernity itself, and American modernity in particular. This requires a comprehensive reexamination of the significance of Communism and its relationship to traditional civilizations within the West. §207 But most https://t.c 30.6K views · 154 likes · 12 reposts · 3 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§201 Communist progress is measured in terms of renunciation and resignation, where a revolution finally reaches its limit. This limit alone defines it as progressive, lasting, objective, and part of the immortal history of mankind - for it defines the finitude of civilization h 28.1K views · 140 likes · 10 reposts · 3 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§194 The era of the rediscovery of Marxism in the West, and America in particular, is upon us. America as the culmination of bourgeois modernity, now faces the certain prospect of civil war. And the self-consuming madness of capitalist modernity imperils all humanity. §195 A 25.7K views · 132 likes · 9 reposts · 3 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§187 Communists do not need to ‘abolish’ anything whatsoever - insofar as anything deserves to be abolish, it has already abolished itself in reality: Only in Communism, are the contradictions, changes, and aspirations of a people suspended into a single phenomenal horizon. 25.5K views · 128 likes · 7 reposts · 7 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§183 Nothing is more anti-communist than Communism itself. Impotent intellectual wimps like James Lindsay and other rightist idiots cannot even dream of coming close: Communism alone emancipates humanity from its objective ‘communist oppression.’ §184 Bourgeois modernity 29K views · 123 likes · 11 reposts · 10 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§171 This is all that humanism in Marxism amounts to: not a specific ontic view of the human elevated above reality, but a recognition of the human as that to which every knowledge returns: Only the return of an outlook, thought, etc. to its real premises, reconciles it as a 25.2K views · 127 likes · 6 reposts · 7 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§151 This brings us to what is by far the most important contribution of Dugin, and which permits him to be characterized as a true metaphysical materialist, going beyond even Heidegger - and that is in Dugin’s concept of Chaos, the true the phenomenal form of material being. 26.1K views · 128 likes · 7 reposts · 7 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§138 Logos is the first forgetting of Being, in the form of Being as the identity of difference. Whereas Heidegger identifies Being with Time, Heraclitus identified Being as change and constant flux, and thus an identity of difference itself. The beginning of Western philosophy. 25.5K views · 120 likes · 7 reposts · 8 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§137 It was Aleksandr Dugin who accomplished the particularization of Heidegger’s concept of Dasein, thus allowing for it to be put to work in productive, even practical ways. And he does this by returning to the beginning of metaphysics according to Heidegger - in Logos. https: 28.3K views · 136 likes · 8 reposts · 11 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§124 Western Marxism, before it engages in ‘historical materialist’ analysis, projects a vulgar metaphysical view (rejected by Marx & Engels) of humanity, according to which mankind dwells at the precipice of physical extinction. Thus, everything about society is reduced to 26.1K views · 120 likes · 8 reposts · 4 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§111 To understand how Being itself acquires a specific determination, it suffices to return to the ontological difference between Being and particular beings. Heidegger situates this difference at the core of Dasein’s existential turmoil, for which Being is always at issue. 26.2K views · 127 likes · 7 reposts · 6 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§104 Heidegger’s shortcoming lies in the ambiguity of Dasein. While Dasein is thrown into a given community, as an established horizon of being, it acquires an authentic relationship to Being only through the exercise of individual will, where it comes to acknowledge its 26K views · 123 likes · 7 reposts · 4 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§96 Typically, Marxists try to resolve antinomy of sociality (either the sum-total of individual subjects or a collective subject individuals are part of) by just grotesquely defining it as a ‘complex’ of relationships between individuals, too numerous to ground in anything 26.2K views · 131 likes · 6 reposts · 9 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§78 Originally a student of Husserl and the phenomenological school, Martin Heidegger inadvertently lays the foundation for a complete rediscovery of Marx, emancipating Western thought from its metaphysical shackles and opening the way for a truly consistent materialist outlook. 38.8K views · 137 likes · 10 reposts · 8 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§73 Marx’s Promethean gesture acquired objective reality and history exclusively outside the West, where objectivity of society was not metaphysical question, but a given reality. And the problem of metaphysics permeated the whole of Western thinking, not just Western Marxism. h 29.8K views · 138 likes · 8 reposts · 4 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§70 Marxism succeeded in overcoming metaphysics, but only within a limited scope of practice. That is namely in the investigations of Marx in Capital, the writings of Fredrich Engels and the concrete historical experience of Marxism-Leninism. §71 Marx and Engels failed to http 31.7K views · 152 likes · 8 reposts · 3 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§58 The problem with Spinozism is not the view that mind and matter (‘subject and object’) share reality, but in the notion of reality as ‘Substance:’ a metaphysical view of the object already united with its subjective determinations. Substance thus has no stake in its https:// 35.3K views · 151 likes · 11 reposts · 5 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§56 Marxists as early as Plekhanov have also opted for regressing into Spinozism as a means to resolve the problem, where subject and object collapse into the supreme Substance. In this way thinking consciousness is the mere attribute of Substance: the most fundamental form of h 31.4K views · 149 likes · 10 reposts · 6 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§51 Moreover, Marxism-Leninism is defined within the context of countries where the question of society and the individual is resolved in the concrete bonds of civilization, bonds which were never questioned even at the height of revolutionary experimentation. §52 In the https 32K views · 162 likes · 8 reposts · 6 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§49 I place special emphasis on Western Marxism, since these questions are obvious within the framework of the experience of Marxism-Leninism. There, the question of the objectivity of society, and Communism, were answered practically: In the Soviet Avant-Garde and in the GPCR. 34.4K views · 171 likes · 9 reposts · 7 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§38 Lukács’ response to this paradox revised Marxism itself. But even if Lukács were to be rejected, the problem remains. Furthermore, what is really the problem with Lukács’s revision, anyway? Exploring that reveals the way to a better solution. §39 As we have shown, the 35.3K views · 172 likes · 8 reposts · 6 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§37 In Marxism, the highest aim of knowledge is to give way to reality. This entails a great trust in material being - anything of importance arrived at by knowledge, is already reconciled within material reality itself. The paradox is that this ‘giving way’ is a necessary act 38.6K views · 217 likes · 17 reposts · 6 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§31 In the realm of science: Metaphysical distrust in reality takes the form of distrust in our conventions, intuitions, religious beliefs, and sensibilities about the nature of reality. Reality is a pure OUTSIDE only accessed by cold, indifferent, impersonal inquiry. §32 In 40K views · 212 likes · 17 reposts · 9 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

§30 In other words, James Lindsay is a fucking moron when he blames wokeism’s metaphysical distrust in reality on Marxism. In actual fact, the distrust in reality is the very basis of bourgeois modernity. It can be thought as the entire premise of the Age of Enlightenment http 48.5K views · 281 likes · 26 reposts · 13 replies 23 Jun 2023 · Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

4 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.

Visualizaciones medianas23 754esta cuenta4 388mediana de 100K–1M

Alcance, %19.91%esta cuenta1.63%mediana de 100K–1M

Interacción, %5.22%esta cuenta1.28%mediana de 100K–1M

Métrica	Esta cuenta	Mediana de 100K–1M	Proporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación	23 754	4 388	5.41×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)	19.91%	1.63%	12.2×
Tasa de interacción	5.22%	1.28%	4.07×

Otras cuentas de este rango → Comparar con otra cuenta → Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

25.5K23 Jun

26.1K

25.2K

29K

25.5K

25.7K

28.1K

30.6K

29.8K

4K13 Oct

10.4K30 Aug

28.1K1 Sep

19.4K2 Sep

34.4K3 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.53%23 Jun

0.55%

0.56%

0.50%

0.56%

0.57%

0.55%

0.56%

0.73%

4.20%13 Oct

7.53%30 Aug

3.83%1 Sep

6.60%2 Sep

3.52%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.28%.

What the audience does

Likes75.0%7 355 in total

Reposts10.0%983 in total

Replies3.9%379 in total

Quotes0.7%67 in total

Bookmarks10.4%1 023 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Últimas publicaciones

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Cuentas similares