tweetindex
ES

Megalithic Mysteries ✓

@Megalithic12000 · joined 30 Jul 2025

Ancient precision. Lost civilisations. Cataclysms that reset humanity. History is far older & stranger than you think. 👁️‍🗨️

21 821Followers
57Following
8 195Posts total
5.2MViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@Megalithic12000 Easy. You drill Richat, explore the tunnels under the Giza plateau, scan every item at Smithsonian and Vatican, dig up the Amazon, dig up Dwarka, collect every bit of evidence you possibly can. There are so many low hanging fruits before you run into the wall. 49 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
The Inca rulers of Cusco each built a palace, but look at what they built on. The earliest sit inside megalithic courtyards that were already there, and the later ones are cobblestone and mud. Why is the finest stonework in Cusco the part the Inca inherited? https://t.co/6UPmCO
696 views · 22 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Two professors at MIT and Frankfurt traced the same numbers through unconnected mythologies. Their conclusion was that the astronomy came from far deeper in time than anyone allows. It was never refuted. Why is ignoring an argument easier than answering it? https://t.co/2xrAz1
955 views · 29 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@Megalithic12000 You cannot easily C14 date waterlogged logs, because they can be infused with old limestone carbon. And the earliest you can C14 date, is about 40,000 years. RE 584 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@Megalithic12000 Vindolanda answers that one. Anaerobic waterlogged soil kept timber, leather and ink tablets intact for 2,000 years. I'd sooner trust a bog than most archives. 445 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
There were logs notched and fitted at right angles in Zambia, dated to around 476,000 years ago. They only survived because the ground was waterlogged. If a civilisation deep in the past had built everything it made from timber, how would we ever know it even existed at all? ht
11.8K views · 369 likes · 31 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
Cut into a desert mesa above the Colorado River in California are human and animal figures the size of buildings, made by scraping dark stones off pale ground. Nobody on foot noticed them for centuries. A pilot spotted them in 1932. What else is sitting under a flight path? htt
2.7K views · 156 likes · 15 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@Megalithic12000 Look at American cities where the nature just takes over houses and abandoned buildings. Now imagine the most dense rainforest ever and a period of 500 years. Entire cities could vanish 112.3K views · 2.8K likes · 8 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@Megalithic12000 "The Europeans killed them with disease" man, Europeans and Asians killed themselves with disease. Everyone got disease. So it goes. Sorry. 170.4K views · 3.9K likes · 15 reposts · 43 replies Open on X →
@Megalithic12000 And now LIDAR is finding that Fransisco was telling the truth all along. It's the discovery of Troy all over again. If mainstream archaeology had any credibility left, they would start doing expeditions with Lidar everywhere there is a "myth" of lost cities. 309.7K views · 8.5K likes · 143 reposts · 47 replies Open on X →
In the 1540s a Spanish expedition was carried the length of the Amazon by accident and reported thriving cities the whole way. A century later nobody could find them, so the account was filed as invention. https://t.co/89HnE2rqMZ
4.6M views · 33.3K likes · 1.1K reposts · 170 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

11 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.

Visualizaciones medianas2 712esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %12.43%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %2.50%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación2 7129242.94×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)12.43%3.62%3.43×
Tasa de interacción2.50%1.52%1.64×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4.6M25 Aug
309.7K
170.4K
112.3K26 Aug
2.7K13 Sep
11.8K
445
584
955
69614 Sep
49

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.75%25 Aug
2.81%
2.31%
2.50%26 Aug
6.42%13 Sep
3.50%
0.22%
1.54%
3.56%
3.30%14 Sep
2.04%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes86.1%49 027 in total
Reposts2.2%1 268 in total
Replies0.5%288 in total
Bookmarks11.1%6 326 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares