tweetindex
ES

MoundLore ✓

@MoundLore

I write things. America’s often forgotten past. Fact-driven. Lore-obsessed. Mounds, myths, maps& LiDAR. I understand people.

86 470Followers
750Following
41 357Posts total
197.3KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

At La Venta, thousands of worked stone objects were deliberately deposited in ceremonial and elite settings, including caches, tombs and massive buried offerings. Some of those offerings contained enormous quantities of worked stone. 5.8K views · 24 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore Do they fit together with this? https://t.co/nLnnG9TAIq
4.4K views · 49 likes · 1 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
We can see workshop debris, stages of manufacture, regional movement of iron ore, huge concentrations at San Lorenzo and wear on the perforations. What disappeared was the ordinary knowledge ancient people probably never thought needed explaining: You know… why they were https:
8K views · 71 likes · 0 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →
At San Lorenzo, the big deposits contain an extraordinary number of intact, fully perforated pieces. Around production areas in Chiapas, unfinished and broken examples are much easier to find. If these were simply disposable parts in a drilling system, you would expect more htt
8.8K views · 56 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Archaeologists have tried to explain them as net weights, beads, fire-making tools, small hammers, atlatl counterweights and amulets. Ann Cyphers and Anna Di Castro proposed something more technical: the perforations may have formed while the blocks were used in a rotating https
9K views · 65 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Plumajillo shows manufacture in Chiapas, but the ore itself may have come from farther away. Mineralogical work has pointed toward source areas in Oaxaca. By the time San Lorenzo flourished, roughly 1400–1000 BC, different parts of this process may have been spread across https:
10.2K views · 51 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
At Plumajillo in the Central Depression of Chiapas, archaeologists found 2,131 pieces showing nearly the whole manufacturing sequence: raw iron ore, rough blocks, undrilled forms, partly drilled examples and finished multiperforated cubes. Nearby sites produced manufacturing htt
11K views · 68 likes · 4 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
They’re usually called multiperforated ilmenite cubes, though plenty aren’t perfect cubes. Ilmenite is a dense iron-titanium oxide, and the perforations preserve evidence of rotary drilling. San Lorenzo did not produce a handful of curiosities. Some deposits contained tens of h
11.4K views · 99 likes · 5 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
The Olmec made thousands of the same little iron-ore object. At San Lorenzo alone, archaeologists have recovered more than six metric tons. Small blocks. Usually three intersecting perforations. Repeated with remarkable consistency. We still don’t know what they were. 🧵 https:
100.5K views · 867 likes · 76 reposts · 140 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore The Adena were a different breed. I love them. 1.1K views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore I wish we’d actually venerate this kind of stuff like we do with Egyptology. Such an abundance of culture, history, and artifacts in a criminally understudied regional timeline. 1.5K views · 23 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore Grill 825 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore They just kept working away at it I guess. https://t.co/iS8B1Y5moj 471 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore Makes sense. They have those huge jaws and big noggins. Were they the giants that supposedly never existed? 561 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@MoundLore What exactly is going on here? Was the wolf jaw surgically implanted in the person? Or was this done post mortem? 677 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Adena https://t.co/uf0nao5YCN 23.2K views · 122 likes · 11 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

10 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a mucha gente, pero pocos de esos espectadores reaccionan.

Visualizaciones medianas8 912esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %10.31%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %0.72%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación8 9129249.64×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)10.31%3.62%2.85×
Tasa de interacción0.72%1.52%0.47×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

56118 Nov
471
825
1.5K19 Nov
1.1K28 Aug
100.5K21 Sep
11.4K
11K
10.2K
9K
8.8K
8K
4.4K22 Sep
5.8K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.71%18 Nov
0.64%
0.48%
1.71%19 Nov
0.36%28 Aug
1.09%21 Sep
0.95%
0.67%
0.54%
0.77%
0.66%
0.99%
1.36%22 Sep
0.43%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes73.5%1 513 in total
Reposts5.0%103 in total
Replies8.6%177 in total
Quotes1.0%20 in total
Bookmarks11.9%246 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares