tweetindex
ES

OffGuardian

@OffGuardian0 · joined 16 Apr 2015

Because facts really SHOULD be sacred. Our editors - @catte_black & @kit_knightly

64 553Followers
1 293Following
36 912Posts total
18.5KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

Conversation with Sasha Latypova https://t.co/817Bp4A4oZ 669 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
To clarify once more since so many people seem to misunderstand , our position on the so-called Covid “pandemic” – as reasoned and evidenced in our “40 Facts” – is - 1. no NEW or distinct disease process has ever been shown to exist 2. all evidence indicates that the illness 1.4K views · 85 likes · 14 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
SF911Truth Annual Film Festival - 9/11 25 Years On https://t.co/Ma9zUwwEWJ 1.1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
...of all things officials "misled" the public about re 9/11, air quality may be the least important. 1.6K views · 26 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@OffGuardian0 #PCRtest. "If you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody" #KaryMullis: Nobel Prize Winning Inventor of PCR: https://t.co/64o94RPVPA
3:49
310 views · 2 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@OffGuardian0 The PCR tests should go down as the greatest fraud of the century but not a lot of people really know or understand how badly they were manipulated to create the narrative. Humanity bent the knee and most never stood back up. 465 views · 21 likes · 5 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@OffGuardian0 This belongs here. I still can't believe they appealed to the labs to read the assay's user manual. Maybe the memo served another purpose, being actually a stop signal. Shortly after sendout, cases worldwide dropped sharply, thus ending the "2nd wave". https://t.co
173 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
TESTING: HOW TO CREATE A PANDEMIC OF A FAKE DISEASE "...With reports of a “new variant” tearing across the United States, I thought now would be a good time to remind people how exactly “Covid” tests worked and what they were for. Not in the biochemical way. We’re not talking 5.1K views · 136 likes · 43 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
The shadow-ban is slowly killing us... most of our 64,000 followers will never see this 7.7K views · 188 likes · 43 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

9 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a menos gente que sus pares, pero los implica mucho más.

Visualizaciones medianas1 060esta cuenta978mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %1.64%esta cuenta3.48%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %3.28%esta cuenta1.92%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación1 0609781.08×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)1.64%3.48%0.47×
Tasa de interacción3.28%1.92%1.71×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7.7K2 Sep
5.1K6 Sep
173
4657 Sep
3108 Sep
1.6K
1.1K
1.4K
669

Last 9 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

3.28%2 Sep
3.83%6 Sep
3.47%
6.02%7 Sep
2.58%8 Sep
1.93%
0.75%
7.81%
0.60%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.92%.

What the audience does

Likes69.0%469 in total
Reposts16.6%113 in total
Replies7.8%53 in total
Quotes0.9%6 in total
Bookmarks5.7%39 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares