tweetindex
ES

Paul Bongiorno

@PaulBongiorno · · joined 30 Nov 2011

Columnist for The Saturday Paper and regular ABC Nightlife commentator, veteran political journalist. His views contestable but his own.

183 273Followers
868Following
33 855Posts total
146.3KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

The lost Whitlam interview https://t.co/JLlQ6antbn A fascinating and illuminating story written with humour and panache worthy of its subject. 4.9K views · 28 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
The antisemitism royal commission made two big mistakes — will these compromise their findings? https://t.co/Sn9fTTnzub Bell has been given an impossible task…a politically craven RC with terms of reference and a pre ordained dubious baseline definition of antisemitism. 5.5K views · 106 likes · 26 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →
@PaulBongiorno This was the safest ALP seat going, it is not an issue for the Libs it is only an issue for Labor. This seat was safer than McGowans and has never been held by anyone other than the ALP. But hey! Cool story… 3.9K views · 460 likes · 28 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
@PaulBongiorno Hi Paul, Just letting you know that I voted in the secret harbour by election and put labour last because of the albo factor. 1.7K views · 225 likes · 6 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Correct me if I am wrong but Secret Harbour was a state by-election in the context of a long term Labor government. In the first instance the implications are harshest for the state Liberals and certainly state Labor. The Albo factor is being opportunistically overstated. 107.8K views · 1.2K likes · 213 reposts · 622 replies Open on X →
What a hoot - should give WA voters at the by-election reason to think twice. https://t.co/AjXOue0U8d 14.8K views · 313 likes · 72 reposts · 40 replies Open on X →
The 50 metre rule in the AFL is an arbitrary blight on the game. The AFL needs to sort out the completely arbitrary nature of the rules as applied by umpires. They are destroying the game 7.6K views · 84 likes · 8 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

7 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.

Visualizaciones medianas5 491esta cuenta5 983mediana de 100K–1M
Alcance, %3.00%esta cuenta1.49%mediana de 100K–1M
Interacción, %2.60%esta cuenta0.93%mediana de 100K–1M
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 100K–1MProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación5 4915 9830.92×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)3.00%1.49%2.01×
Tasa de interacción2.60%0.93%2.80×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7.6K22 Aug
14.8K29 Aug
107.8K30 Aug
1.7K
3.9K
5.5K1 Sep
4.9K5 Sep

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.38%22 Aug
2.92%29 Aug
1.94%30 Aug
13.68%
12.67%
2.60%1 Sep
0.63%5 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes68.1%2 429 in total
Reposts9.9%353 in total
Replies19.5%696 in total
Quotes1.7%59 in total
Bookmarks0.9%32 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares