Pessimists Archive ✓

@PessimistsArc · joined 19 Oct 2015

Fear of new things in the past. History of resistance to new technologies & ideas. Curated by @louisanslow NEWSLETTER: https://t.co/ICDLE3Wrbm

96 133Followers

297Following

12 071Posts total

25KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

Dario said it was too dangerous to release, then two promethean graduate students released it anyway. https://t.co/A2GCXh2Oiv https://t.co/ETJ1Vvb1pI

1.6K views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

This really ought to be mentioned with any interview of Dario related to AI risk. 2.3K views · 21 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

@PessimistsArc https://t.co/cv1d9NEvfh We released an open replication before OpenAI released their official model weights. 3K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

DooMoore's law https://t.co/XyxJTNfNgh

5.4K views · 102 likes · 16 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

The history of nuclear technology shows that even with global binding treaties, hysterical fear of a new technology can rob us of critical upsides that make the future more dangerous. https://t.co/WLWBGSSTt9

5.4K views · 24 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc13 Sep

A good faith comparison between AI and nuclear technology wouldn’t just talk about the success of concern driven non-proliferation treaties and the risk they reduced, it would talk about the concern driven failure of nuclear energy regulation and the risk that increased. 3.5K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Pessimists Archive ✓@PessimistsArc11 Sep

Powerful new technologies are often victim of an ‘emergent conspiracy’ of opposition. Protectionists will emphasize real or imagined downsides of disruptive tech. Publishers will run stories about them. Politicians will propose laws to address + elicit protectionist support. 3.8K views · 28 likes · 5 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

7 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. alcance normal para su tamaño, reacción más débil que la mayoría.

Visualizaciones medianas3 512esta cuenta991mediana de 10K–100K

Alcance, %3.65%esta cuenta3.67%mediana de 10K–100K

Interacción, %0.55%esta cuenta1.61%mediana de 10K–100K

Métrica	Esta cuenta	Mediana de 10K–100K	Proporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación	3 512	991	3.54×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)	3.65%	3.67%	1.00×
Tasa de interacción	0.55%	1.61%	0.34×

Otras cuentas de este rango → Comparar con otra cuenta → Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.8K11 Sep

3.5K13 Sep

5.4K

2.3K

1.6K

Last 7 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.89%11 Sep

0.17%13 Sep

0.55%

2.25%

0.17%

1.17%

0.31%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.61%.

What the audience does

Likes74.9%188 in total

Reposts13.5%34 in total

Replies2.4%6 in total

Bookmarks9.2%23 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Últimas publicaciones

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Cuentas similares