tweetindex
ES

Eric Berger

@SciGuySpace

Senior Space Editor at Ars Technica. Likes rockets. Author of the best-selling book on the Falcon 9 and Dragon, REENTRY. https://t.co/5HYUhJzFHZ

437 539Followers
767Following
62 758Posts total
3.2MViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@SciGuySpace I simply cannot believe this might happen. Disaster? Yes. Tragic? Absolutely. Sickening? I think so. Jared @rookisaacman doesn't need @NASA but it surely needs him. 16.6K views · 519 likes · 21 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
The reality is that Jared cared deeply about NASA and space exploration. There’s no guarantee the next person will. More likely is that we get someone who acts out of loyalty to the administration first and foremost. 91.3K views · 2.2K likes · 99 reposts · 60 replies Open on X →
A likely disaster for NASA. There were two final choices for admin six months ago. One was a budget cutter. The other was Jared. 1M views · 3.6K likes · 294 reposts · 198 replies Open on X →
@SciGuySpace Cutting JPL would be quite simply one of the most tragic things to ever happen to science. 523 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I'm seeing confusion about who is making the cuts. It's not NASA. It's not Jared Isaacman (he's not confirmed yet). It's not Elon. It's mostly the White House Office of Management and Budget. In terms of sourcing, I did not receive these documents from NASA employees. 59.7K views · 1.1K likes · 53 reposts · 33 replies Open on X →
Note that the story references the likely closure of Goddard Space Flight Center. However other centers, including the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, would be at grave risk. These cuts threaten NASA's entire science portfolio across several centers. 88.4K views · 1K likes · 71 reposts · 18 replies Open on X →
@SciGuySpace Troubling. I am very much in favor of science, but unfortunately cannot participate in NASA budget discussions, due to SpaceX being a major contractor to NASA. 258.7K views · 3.8K likes · 256 reposts · 268 replies Open on X →
If you care about science at NASA, this is royally sucks. https://t.co/mjHH0dZVhG 1.6M views · 4.5K likes · 807 reposts · 347 replies Open on X →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6M11 Apr
258.7K
88.4K
59.7K
523
1M31 May
91.3K
16.6K

Last 8 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.36%11 Apr
1.69%
1.29%
1.98%
2.10%
0.41%31 May
2.65%
3.33%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views.

What the audience does

Likes81.2%16 815 in total
Reposts7.7%1 601 in total
Replies4.5%934 in total
Quotes2.5%515 in total
Bookmarks4.1%844 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares