tweetindex
ES

Timothy B. Lee

@binarybits · Washington, DC · joined 17 Mar 2008

Reporting on AI and the future of the economy. CS masters degree from Princeton. Newsletter: https://t.co/MAwkvzSSr3 Podcast: https://t.co/aJSErfcE8Y

52 595Followers
1 603Following
108 609Posts total
265.2KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@binarybits in all these alarm raising pieces i have yet to see ANY specifics as to how we will be " destroyed" Gonna come rip the potatoes out of the fields? 433 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@binarybits Feels like you really need a timeline. 1.4K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@binarybits Even though I don’t think the responses are unreasonable I’m a little skeptical it’s what people truly believe. Feel like some people may just be essentially expressing negative sentiment towards AI without literally believing it may *destroy humanity* 578 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
This is wild. (I would have said "very small risk.") https://t.co/Mkxj5ifPw5 https://t.co/zXAcFx4ybQ
68.7K views · 57 likes · 4 reposts · 16 replies Open on X →
This is a great illustration of why training robots manipulation tasks in simulation (middle clip) doesn't work very well. From Kai's excellent new piece on robot data. https://t.co/2ysIIvThKK https://t.co/VJDbshw5NR 7.9K views · 33 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
There are so many organizations supporting people who "work on AI safety" and I don't understand what they all do. (I don't mean this as a criticism! Probably just my ignorance.) 12.2K views · 113 likes · 2 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
I'm very excited to announce that Kairos just raised $50M from @coeff_giving to build talent infrastructure for AI safety. We're using it to ambitiously grow our team and portfolio of projects, and we're now hiring for 10 open roles. 🧵 https://t.co/JUYVm345Za 56.8K views · 590 likes · 40 reposts · 68 replies Open on X →
Coming tomorrow for Robot Week: a 4,200-word explainer on VLA models. Paid subscribers only. 1.9K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@binarybits @chi_t_williams years versus decades is a wide spread. which end do you lean toward, and what would move you across it? 384 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
People declaring some event to be the ChatGPT of robotics should think about the fact that it took 2-3 years before ChatGPT had a significant impact on even one profession. And that was an app with instant, free distribution. Robots will take a lot longer. 3.6K views · 38 likes · 0 reposts · 6 replies Open on X →
This morning we published a @chi_t_williams article stating that "Waymo has active robotaxi deployments in 11 cities." An hour later Waymo tweeted this. https://t.co/Bbn3UiIneq 5.3K views · 20 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Please check out Kai's post! https://t.co/KVbCSf8UHa 1.6K views · 8 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Robots with legs make for impressive demos, but they have some serious downsides. If you make them stand up for too long (think minutes, not hours) their motors will overheat and they might suddenly collapse. https://t.co/YsMT4ZUe7p 3K views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Last year roboticist Benjie Holson created the "Humanoid Olympics," a list of tasks that are trivial for humans but hard for robots. A startup called Physical Intelligence solved several of them three months later. But there were some big caveats! https://t.co/h0GyzqKQvx 4K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Robots can dance, do backflips, and run faster than Usain Bolt. This makes a lot of people worry about mass unemployment. But @chi_t_williams wrote an amazing article explaining why it'll take years — possibly decades — for robots to match humans. https://t.co/KVbCSf8UHa 97.3K views · 167 likes · 43 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

15 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a mucha gente, pero pocos de esos espectadores reaccionan.

Visualizaciones medianas3 606esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %6.86%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %0.62%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación3 6069243.90×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)6.86%3.62%1.89×
Tasa de interacción0.62%1.52%0.40×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

4K1 Sep
3K
1.6K
5.3K
3.6K2 Sep
384
1.9K
56.8K3 Sep
12.2K
7.9K
68.7K17 Sep
578
1.4K
433

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.35%1 Sep
0.46%
0.67%
0.43%
1.22%2 Sep
0.52%
0.62%
1.25%3 Sep
1.04%
0.47%
0.13%17 Sep
1.21%
0.91%
0.69%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes67.3%1 083 in total
Reposts5.9%95 in total
Replies7.7%124 in total
Quotes2.0%33 in total
Bookmarks17.1%275 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares