tweetindex
ES

Cyan Banister

@cyantist · San Francisco · joined 13 Feb 2008

Tizz Venture Artist @longjourneyvc, joy amplifier. subscription fees go to Inflection Grants: https://t.co/uSqtEEfmpv.

79 727Followers
4 171Following
59 382Posts total
186.1KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@cyantist CC @DylanAbruscato 206 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@cyantist Dylan is too busy rn @DylanAbruscato 153 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@cyantist I feel like it was such a unifying experience 243 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
So, when do we get another HQ Trivia? 11.4K views · 109 likes · 2 reposts · 23 replies Open on X →
Love is infinite!! https://t.co/aGKUrwnOC6 2K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I waited to wade into the turbulent response behind OpenAI’s post about the Navier-Stokes proof until the waters stilled. What does the proof tell us and not tell us? What did the headlines get wrong? Justin from Reynko does a perfect job of explaining here: 26.4K views · 35 likes · 8 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
In the nineties the U.S. government classified strong encryption as a munition. Not a metaphor... the same export rules that covered missile parts covered math. https://t.co/WAyx8idaCG https://t.co/OPDVtiNz82
9.4K views · 83 likes · 9 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
lol! 9.5K views · 24 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@cyantist There we go - sorted. https://t.co/atCO4zdNjK
10.2K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@cyantist one of my very favorite books 228 views · 2 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Images: Christopher Michel (1), freestocks (2), TeachAIDS (6), Satheesh Sankaran (9), Lambtron (11), Andy Sproles/ORNL (15), Nigel Cox (20), Yale Center for British Art (23); all others via Wikimedia Commons. All Creative Commons or public domain. 1.1K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
The future doesn't arrive evenly, even in the book. It finds one person the system wasn't designed for, and it starts there. The Nells were never scarce. The Primers were. Now they aren't. Find more Nells. https://t.co/ywWfcSdd06
1.2K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Nell got her Primer because her brother Harv mugged a man and brought it home. It saved her, not him. She got taken in by the neo-Victorians. He ended up bedridden, lungs wrecked by the toner he breathed as a kid. https://t.co/Mttqu61gGw
692 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Elizabeth Finkle-McGraw was meant to be another. The most powerful technology in the book was built to raise one. We built the tutor and aimed it at test prep. https://t.co/GR8eUugzZQ
697 views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Someone who works the system without being captured by it, who looks foolish first, then dangerous, then obvious. I've been writing about this archetype for a while - the useful rogue. I told one of their stories here: https://t.co/xXCcP4WkW5 https://t.co/n1uAu1Q3n1
1.2K views · 24 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The reason the Primer exists at all is the part everyone skips. Finkle-McGraw commissions it because the schools produce obedient mediocrities, and he wants something else for his granddaughter. Not a rebel - rebels get expelled. A rogue. https://t.co/LhnODahO88
791 views · 19 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It also says the kids end up running things anyway. Both halves of that are worth sitting with. https://t.co/wWFAzjWQSR
810 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
We are handing a generation of kids the degraded version - no Miranda, test-prep objectives - and assuming the outcomes will be equal because the access is equal. The book says they won't be. https://t.co/v0oIdPkk5n
822 views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The yet-to-come that matters most is the Mouse Army. In the book, the girls raised on degraded Primers grow up to be a political force that redraws the map. https://t.co/PRn9ESRHnu
854 views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
It built a working graphene lattice out of 37 molecules. The compiler is arriving through biology too - mRNA is programmable matter, and molecular machines took the Nobel in chemistry in 2016. It just doesn't look the way he drew it. https://t.co/6VAS5Zfgvb
952 views · 17 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
But the machinery just got less theoretical. Last week, researchers at Oak Ridge published a system that hands the controls to an AI: it nudges single molecules across copper with a microscope tip and assembles materials atom by atom, working 25 hours without a human. https://t.c
992 views · 28 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
What hasn't come true is the nanotechnology itself. Matter compilers, smart matter. 3D printing was the false start - the Feed, the global supply chain, stayed cheaper than fabricating at home, and to his credit the book understood that economics too. https://t.co/yiVXT7JwIT
1K views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
What he got half-right: the phyles. People do sort globally by affinity now - I get pitched network states - but the states didn't dissolve. Borders got harder. The sorting happened socially, not legally. I suspect the book has the last word eventually. It just hasn't yet. https:
1.1K views · 19 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
In the book, whoever controls the Source controls everything downstream, which reads now like a paragraph about cloud computing written before Amazon sold any. https://t.co/aF1NkjRcmQ
1.2K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The Feed and the Seed - one system where everything flows from a central Source, one where you grow your own - is the fight in my inbox. The foundation labs are the Source. Open weights on a garage machine are the Seed. https://t.co/utfxSim1Dt
1.6K views · 19 likes · 1 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
He didn't just imagine a currency - he wrote out the mechanism, what happens to governments when money moves beyond their reach. That argument is playing out in real time. https://t.co/clX6Qy13vr
1.3K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The book's backstory holds its best prediction, and almost nobody talks about it. In Stephenson's future, the nation-states collapsed because encrypted money made them impossible to tax. He wrote that in 1995. The Bitcoin whitepaper is 2008. https://t.co/Yslm1mi7N8
1.9K views · 38 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Including the part we still haven't fixed, which is that the Mirandas stay invisible. These days they're called data labelers and RLHF contractors. https://t.co/0t1hSnW1wO
1.6K views · 18 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
I founded Zivity, which paid models and photographers directly from their fans. Everyone called it a platform. It was a ractive. The creator economy, the gig performer behind the interface - the book had all of it. https://t.co/Kv1wWlg65s
1.7K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Miranda is also the part that feels most like my own life. She's a performer with an audience of one, paid per connection, and the connection is real even though it runs through a machine. https://t.co/BBakvPCopr
1.9K views · 21 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

54 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a menos gente que cuentas de su tamaño.

Visualizaciones medianas1 287esta cuenta955mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %1.61%esta cuenta3.52%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %1.74%esta cuenta1.56%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación1 2879551.35×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)1.61%3.52%0.46×
Tasa de interacción1.74%1.56%1.12×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

6979 Sep
692
1.2K
1.1K
228
10.2K12 Sep
9.5K
9.4K13 Sep
26.4K14 Sep
2K
11.4K16 Sep
243
153
206

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.00%9 Sep
1.59%
1.17%
1.11%
1.32%
0.06%12 Sep
0.27%
1.02%13 Sep
0.18%14 Sep
0.46%
1.19%16 Sep
3.29%
2.61%
2.43%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.56%.

What the audience does

Likes79.2%625 in total
Reposts2.9%23 in total
Replies8.6%68 in total
Quotes0.3%2 in total
Bookmarks9.0%71 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

10 Sep

Daily snapshots since 10 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Cuentas similares