tweetindex
ES

Ginevra Lily Davis ✓

@ginevlily

philosofoid

3 653Followers
341Following
238Posts total
799.4KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@ginevlily @elonmusk I don't think AI will destroy humanity, but if it does, then there is not a shred of solace to be taken in the fact that it "survives" us. AI is not alive, it has no qualia, no experiences, no love, no meaning beyond the arbitrary "ambition" encoded in its we 791 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/vj52VdCrPS
933 views · 10 likes · 1 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
I have been a bit… extra existential recently; if you think superintelligence (or, it seems more likely, a recursively evolving swarm of many, many superintelligences) will “figure out” whatever it matters to “figure out,” it starts to feel like there may be much less need for 859 views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I have always been struck by the smallness of human life compared to the massive scale of the cosmic “game board” we find ourselves in: ~5–6 feet tall vs. the ~93-billion-light-year diameter of the observable universe; ~80-year lifespans vs. 100 trillion, or quadrillion, or 843 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
This gets into the final sense of the “meaning of life.” We humans seem to have almost contradictory requirements for a “meaning of life,” which have only (so far) ever been successfully fulfilled by religions carefully crafted for our sensibilities: we want our meaning to be 870 views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I am generally skeptical of arguments in the form of “XYZ thing is just a new God” or “XYZ thing is what the God-people were always talking about” (I think people who believe in God generally mean something pretty specific). But if “something matters” in human life, then it seems 853 views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
There are a lot of explanations for why the “something matters” → “superintelligence is like us but better” jump is not particularly common, but one, I think, is the general sense that AI systems are somehow discontinuous from the process that created us; that they are not https:
1.1K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
For a spoiler for the end of the essay, what we lose, I think, if we accept any kind of moral realism (a realistic one that respects the “betweenness” of the kind of thing that value seems to be, and that compiles to something objective enough to be mind-independent) is the sense 1.2K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
On the flip side of “taking nihilism seriously” is taking non-nihilism seriously (which is just “moral realism,” although the term “moral realism” contains some humanistic baggage that I don’t really like). If reality contains reasons to create some futures over others, then htt
1.2K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
But what about the orthogonality thesis? Sometimes, I think that the drum that I will beat most aggressively in this life is that we (“we” being highly educated intellectuals in the West; this is not a very widespread problem across human history) have lost touch with the 5K views · 11 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The worldview that makes the strongest version of the orthogonality thesis feel intuitive (barring, yes, details about the relationship between reasons and action), is far more universal, and extreme, and cutting than it is commonly given credit for. On true “nothing matters” htt
1.3K views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
If you take any kind of materialism seriously, then it seems incredibly unlikely that we humans, formed by a blind evolutionary process and made out of the same stardust as everything else, have privileged access to some quasi-mystical “moral reasoning” capacity that other minds 1.4K views · 12 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The most important “hinge” in our attitudes toward AGI, of course, is the question of whether future superintelligences will preserve the essence of “what matters,” the thing that we assume is contained within the children of each new generation. And on this point, I have never 1.4K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/REtwlMd10g
1.6K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The way we think about it with parents and children is something like: yes, the death of every existing person is a tragedy, and future people will not be the same people, but some fundamental civilizational essence has not been lost. The thing is alive in the children (unless 2K views · 13 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I didn’t quite have this language when I was writing the piece, but I tend to think of human beings as “containers” for the things that matter. There is an enormous amount of what seems like “goodness” (or its correlates) contained in human life—love, beauty, joy, consciousness, 1.7K views · 17 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
I do not think, at all, that we lead valueless lives (although there is no way to know for sure, the question remains open). But I think I am unusually comfortable with the idea that the “point” of something might be contained partly in what it gives rise to, rather than in its 2.9K views · 21 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The idea that being a “bootloader” for something else is inherently undignified always struck me as a bit odd. Maybe it is some of the female perspective—I have always assumed that a lot of the “value” of my life might be contained in raising children, or helping a partner, and 2.4K views · 24 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The motivating thought experiment: https://t.co/MSw4W9o9KD
10K views · 50 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
I have always been interested in the question of the “right amount of time” for a given species, or civilization, or even individual to stick around. The knowledge that everything ends (species with extinction, cultures with assimilation or dispersal, individual lives with 11.2K views · 80 likes · 6 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →
Link: https://t.co/nu2nktwEP9 (From @arenamagdotcom's beautiful print book) 9.2K views · 54 likes · 7 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
An actually-serious case that being a “biological bootloader for digital superintelligence” (per @elonmusk) is a credible, dignified, and good-enough “meaning of life.” I started writing this one partly as a joke (“Elon Musk accidentally solved the meaning of life in a tweet!”)
740.7K views · 325 likes · 34 reposts · 39 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

22 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de under 10K seguidores. por debajo de sus pares en alcance y en interacción.

Visualizaciones medianas1 387esta cuenta4 175mediana de under 10K
Alcance, %37.97%esta cuenta250.82%mediana de under 10K
Interacción, %1.00%esta cuenta1.41%mediana de under 10K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de under 10KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación1 3874 1750.33×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)37.97%2.5× audience0.15×
Tasa de interacción1.00%1.41%0.71×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.6K2 Sep
1.4K
1.4K
1.3K
5K
1.2K
1.2K
1.1K
853
870
843
859
933
7913 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.70%2 Sep
0.78%
0.96%
0.76%
0.26%
1.20%
1.06%
1.23%
1.17%
1.26%
1.30%
1.51%
1.61%
1.52%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes63.2%730 in total
Reposts4.7%54 in total
Replies7.0%81 in total
Quotes2.3%27 in total
Bookmarks22.8%263 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares