tweetindex
ES

LaurieWired ✓

@lauriewired · somewhere in Protocol 7 · joined 03 Jan 2023

researcher @google; serial complexity unpacker; https://t.co/Vl1seeNgYK ex @ msft & aerospace

162 558Followers
302Following
4 433Posts total
851.4KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

@lauriewired THE RETURN OF OPTANE?? 2.1K views · 32 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@lauriewired It's all overkill anyways. 640k should be plenty enough to run all current applications. 2.6K views · 76 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@lauriewired memory bandwidth curve (real, random access) is also quite flat 7.9K views · 74 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
No one talks about how the DRAM density curve has basically…flattened. Maxed-out Server 2021: 8TB Ram Maxed-out Server 2026: …also 8TB Ram That’s insane! A five-year stagnation. If your working set exceeds 8TB, tough luck! Quite literally the only thing that’s going to get htt
163.7K views · 2.8K likes · 148 reposts · 186 replies Open on X →
@lauriewired Headphones that I use for gunshot suppression take a pragmatic approach. Heavy shells over ears block almost all sound, and a small built-in stereo microphone picks up small sounds and plays them in your ears. https://t.co/lTZ7yWc1td 1.6K views · 49 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
thankfully I have built-in noise cancelling btw ear rumblers unite 11.5K views · 190 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →
How good could active noise canceling in headphones get? It’s really one of the tightest time constraints in computing. Obviously, sound hits the microphone first *before* hitting your eardrum…but that’s only about 10 microseconds. This is (part) of the reason why you can’t htt 96.8K views · 2.2K likes · 60 reposts · 88 replies Open on X →
@lauriewired The name “WebAssembly” was funny from day 1 😂 Luke insists it’s a good name but none of us suggested a better one. So it stuck. Nice to see NASA moving WASM from S-expressions to something where spaces are significant 🙃 https://t.co/Bd5ycr6woX 11.1K views · 189 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
Now I’m SURE *any* code run on space hardware would still go through flight qualification. However, compiling it for SpaceWASM would automatically meet a certain subset of the requirements. As in, instead of having to prove every single line item in your program (like, could 22.3K views · 303 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
I’ve alway’s thought it’s a shame that WebAssembly has the word “web” in it. Gives it a connotation that it’s “only for browsers” or something. Meanwhile, NASA’s over here with a flight-compliant derivative (SpaceWASM) intended for spacecraft! The intent is writing mission http 281.1K views · 4.9K likes · 335 reposts · 93 replies Open on X →
I'm chatting about some C++ and memory architectures at 10:30AM PST! 26.4K views · 299 likes · 11 reposts · 12 replies Open on X →
AGENT CIVILIZATIONS | AI CYBER DISCOURSE | TIM COOK’S LAST DAY https://t.co/A6xFNciEiy 49.8K views · 52 likes · 7 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
good thread 37.9K views · 358 likes · 11 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
I've seen some people talking about "emulators" (CPU-based) versus "FPGA" again lately, and which is "better", and whether FPGAs are actually a form of emulation or not. 58.3K views · 325 likes · 31 reposts · 9 replies Open on X →
I’ll be giving a keynote at CppCon 2026 this September, and releasing an open-source intelligent memory tiering library to go with it! Alternative tiers of memory with vastly different latency characteristics are important considerations with current demand pressures (CXL, far h 78.1K views · 1.6K likes · 65 reposts · 35 replies Open on X →
WebAssembly: neither Web nor Assembly. 0 views · 170 likes · 16 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

15 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 100K–1M seguidores. llega mucho más allá de su propia audiencia, y esa audiencia responde.

Visualizaciones medianas26 446esta cuenta5 983mediana de 100K–1M
Alcance, %16.27%esta cuenta1.49%mediana de 100K–1M
Interacción, %1.71%esta cuenta0.93%mediana de 100K–1M
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 100K–1MProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación26 4465 9834.42×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)16.27%1.49%10.9×
Tasa de interacción1.71%0.93%1.84×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

58.3K30 Aug
37.9K
49.8K31 Aug
26.4K
281.1K
22.3K
11.1K
96.8K2 Sep
11.5K
1.6K
163.7K4 Sep
7.9K
2.6K
2.1K

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.63%30 Aug
0.98%
0.13%31 Aug
1.22%
1.92%
1.38%
1.73%
2.45%2 Sep
1.71%
3.25%
1.90%4 Sep
0.94%
2.96%
1.66%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 0.93%.

What the audience does

Likes76.4%13 430 in total
Reposts3.8%672 in total
Replies2.6%451 in total
Quotes0.4%79 in total
Bookmarks16.7%2 942 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares