tweetindex
ES

Frank Wang 玉伯 ✓

@lifesinger · FUTURE · joined 10 Oct 2008

I am curious and honest

47 034Followers
1 347Following
5 707Posts total
171.5KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

https://t.co/9wcWDSY4eN 585 views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
今天一朋友说:硅谷 AI 应用创业公司,经常是增长团队和产研团队人数一样多。 原因很简单:有了 AI 后,产品研发只是时间问题。真正决定差距的,是增长。我比你会搞流量,我就赢过了你。 好朴实无华又无比正确的团队策略。 24.6K views · 196 likes · 16 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger 我到挺希望他维持在花花公子状态的,如果有一天它真的能赚钱,那么意味着租赁给你,是毫无价值的事,它的创造者,唯一需要的,是让它参与你的竞争,然后干掉你… 825 views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger Anthropic 和 OpenAI 都在通过夸大AI能力来抬高自己公司的市值。比如最近的数学证明,这几个问题的证明全球能看懂的人大概也就5个人左右,且要花大量时间在论证其证明过程的准确与否,即便AI证明有漏洞那也是半年后才会被人提出来。Anthropic 和 OpenAI就是拿捏了这点,在这段时间炒作抬高市值准备上市 1K views · 7 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger 赚不赚钱得看谁拿锄头。我们几个人的小团队,靠 agent 把原来要外包的活干掉了,钱确实省下来了,但省的这笔钱不在 Anthropic 账上。这算 AI 会赚钱,还是不会? 2.3K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
如果 AI 真的很强,那么应该很擅长赚钱。进一步,意味着 Anthropic 可以靠着最强模型疯狂赚钱。意味着,其实都不用焦虑上市了。 现实情况是,无论 Anthropic 还是 OpenAI,都很想上市。很想通过资本市场来获得大量钱。 因此可以反推:AI 其实根本还不太强,大量 62.8K views · 358 likes · 27 reposts · 102 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger 说的很对。一群道貌岸然的东西。自己有了武林秘籍,就希望别人都不能拥有。 857 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger 其实its easy to be critical, 我也看过不少类似的观点 说regulatory capture 对incumbent更有利 所以dario别有用心或者没有抱着最大的善意。我倒是觉得 这些只能说明these measures are not perfect(因为有secondary effects, intended or unintended), 可是真的有perfect response吗, what are the 843 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/53lwIkXwDH 19.4K views · 151 likes · 28 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →
@lifesinger 写的挺好,我判定这不是AI写的 986 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
https://t.co/RyZUHAPiMq 57.3K views · 177 likes · 29 reposts · 29 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

11 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. por debajo de sus pares en alcance y en interacción.

Visualizaciones medianas1 014esta cuenta1 015mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %2.16%esta cuenta4.00%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %0.73%esta cuenta1.55%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación1 0141 0151.00×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)2.16%4.00%0.54×
Tasa de interacción0.73%1.55%0.47×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

57.3K13 Sep
986
19.4K
843
857
62.8K
2.3K
1K
82514 Sep
24.6K
58515 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.41%13 Sep
0.30%
1.00%
0.12%
0.12%
0.78%
0.58%
0.79%
0.73%14 Sep
0.97%
1.37%15 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.55%.

What the audience does

Likes54.3%916 in total
Reposts5.9%100 in total
Replies10.6%178 in total
Bookmarks29.2%493 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares