tweetindex
ES

Tom Clark

@prospect_clark · Back in the West Riding · joined 04 Jun 2009

Contributing Editor, @prospect_uk. Principal Editor, @ResFoundation. Stints: @jrf_uk; @guardian; @theIFS. BROKE out now: https://t.co/jWSHf4QucE

21 475Followers
3 841Following
31 756Posts total
33.6KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

No end in sight My chat with @FukuyamaFrancis -- as he looks back over his life & career, and forward into a wildly uncertain future https://t.co/Pa8iS2EZNT 483 views · 4 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Deleting earlier post re a Spectator piece that appeared to suggest Edinburgh was 600 miles from London, as I can’t tell if this came from the writer or the subject. Either way, I’d hope a sub would query, & if it came from subject, attributing it would have been wise 717 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Featuring the forgotten lessons of 1945 1.3K views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
In 1945, Attlee made a last-minute swap of the man preparing to be his chancellor with a man well-set to be foreign secretary What lessons for Andy Burnham as he makes a similar swap? https://t.co/LHtQ0Zhpe8 585 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Thanks to @IPPR for commissioning, to @pathwithanr Will Davies, @jrgingrich for deft editing, @David_Sturrock for exposing me to all @TheIFS excellent work in this area & @AnalysisAndrew for help on housing data 530 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@prospect_clark @IPPR Great paper Tom. Time to follow the model of the Swiss cantons. 61 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
10/ Apols for overlong thread If you've got this far, try the paper! https://t.co/2y1sItCfNh 586 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
9/ Current stance confused Some great initiatives; eg compulsory purchase reform to tackle speculative swelling of land wealth But then chumming up to BlackRock, an icon of the Big Wealth era Budget backlash explains nerves But big bold arguments needed to take on Big Wealth 419 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
8/ When Lab politicians claim to back "wealth creation" we must hope (& I'm inclined to give them this much) they do NOT mean "let's have another 45 years of speculative frenzy so we can make Big Wealth even bigger" BUT ... 414 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
7/ Big Wealth really doesn't mean big prosperity At the height of the Euro crisis stricken Cyprus had bigger wealth per capita than Germany -- even as it begged for a bailout 446 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
6/ OK, so what the hell is "good wealth"?! Here are some tentative criterion from the paper https://t.co/oEdPvIaKS6 467 views · 1 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
4/ Big Wealth is killing opportunity; eg - under-40s raised in rentals now less than half as likely to own as counterparts whose parents owned - being raised with "top 1% wealth" now has more bearing on who makes the elite (defined as in Who's Who) than a generation ago 700 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
3/ In 20th Century wealth seemed to be evolving into something more democratic; eg more homeowners in every census But look at what’s happened in the 21st: across the entire working-age population, a 12 point swing out of home-buying & into costly/insecure private rentals https 982 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
2/ You already know wealth is unequal but did you know how unequal? On official figures, the top tenth own half of everything The bottom three-tenths? They own 1% of all the wealth between them https://t.co/ZwTymRm05O 8.4K views · 27 likes · 27 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
1/ Wealth has raced ahead of earnings, creating a new caste society Tax is only part of the answer: we also need a new political economy that differentiates good & bad wealth My major new @ippr report: Earning Vs Owning https://t.co/2y1sItCfNh https://t.co/Cwx1ATtRC2 17.5K views · 77 likes · 49 reposts · 10 replies Open on X →

Frente a cuentas del mismo tamaño

1 publicaciones de los últimos 90 días, junto al rango de 10K–100K seguidores. llega a menos gente que cuentas de su tamaño.

Visualizaciones medianas483esta cuenta924mediana de 10K–100K
Alcance, %2.25%esta cuenta3.62%mediana de 10K–100K
Interacción, %1.66%esta cuenta1.52%mediana de 10K–100K
MétricaEsta cuentaMediana de 10K–100KProporción
Visualizaciones medianas por publicación4839240.52×
Alcance (visualizaciones ÷ seguidores)2.25%3.62%0.62×
Tasa de interacción1.66%1.52%1.09×

Otras cuentas de este rango →   Comparar con otra cuenta →   Cómo se construyen estas referencias →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

8.4K27 Nov
982
700
467
446
414
419
586
61
530
58521 Jul
1.3K
7171 Aug
4833 Sep

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.68%27 Nov
0.92%
0.71%
1.07%
0.67%
0.97%
0.95%
0.85%
3.28%
0.38%
0.17%21 Jul
0.00%
0.14%1 Aug
1.66%3 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes44.0%124 in total
Reposts33.0%93 in total
Replies8.2%23 in total
Quotes1.1%3 in total
Bookmarks13.8%39 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares