tweetindex
ES

Steve Vladeck

@steve_vladeck · Taxation w/o Representation · joined 26 Sep 2011

@ksvesq’s husband; father of daughters; prof. @GeorgetownLaw; #SCOTUS nerd @CNN & https://t.co/idn6dtcBR3; NYT bestseller: https://t.co/FmqTSPSMH3; #LGM

200 937Followers
3 111Following
43 213Posts total
428.5KViews on collected posts

Últimas publicaciones

Hey @SlangsOnSports, when’s the last time a team scored 10 or more runs in an extra inning? Asking for some … friends. 15.6K views · 32 likes · 1 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck Letting states use unconstitutional maps bc it’s too late for change one term then acting fast so they are redrawn the next term - each benefiting Rs - are the most obviously political acts the Court has taken. How do they justify it to themselves? How do you avoi 2K views · 126 likes · 13 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck @Ryan2011Angela Had to look it up. More people need to know this by name and in detail. Amazing that we seem to have no recourses when all three branches of government behave corruptly. https://t.co/nJ7LT5uLkM 3.5K views · 114 likes · 42 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck @rolandsmartin SCOTUS bought and paid for by Leo and the Heritage Foundation, at the expense of the Constitution they are responsible to uphold and defend. A sad, cynical, pathetic and destructive era for the SC. 3.7K views · 216 likes · 37 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Other than discovering that I’m apparently John Oliver’s son, @LastWeekTonight’s deep dive into the shadow docket is really quite good: https://t.co/EbR3uV8XBE 15K views · 118 likes · 36 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
The redistricting chaos we’re seeing in AL, FL, LA, TN, and VA is something #SCOTUS knowingly enabled, and it belies both the putative purpose of the “Purcell principle” and the Court’s repeated insistence that it’s staying out of the political process: https://t.co/1t66xX7t5F 146K views · 3K likes · 1.3K reposts · 86 replies Open on X →
Not only is the after-the-fact claim belied by evidence; it's also sometimes the justices' own behavior (with regard to whether they decide a case broadly or narrowly) that is responsible for *both* whether a case is "big" and whether it divides the Court along ideological lines. 24.6K views · 300 likes · 82 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck rebuts Justice Amy Coney Barrett's claim that the media makes #SCOTUS look more partisan through post hoc tinkering with which cases are big ones https://t.co/mU50BV2AXe 30.3K views · 57 likes · 23 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck 🤣🤣 enjoy your echo chamber. 80 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck Another Steve with similar plans: stevenmazie 1.5K views · 5 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@steve_vladeck Thank you genuinely, for your work! You are greatly appreciated by many more than you know. What a world, no? You provide info, and your reward is venom and toxicity? Lo siento. 😣😕 462 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I'm going to continue posting to this site, but not engaging. It's just not worth the steady stream of toxicity and venom. I'll be much more active over where the sky is blue (stevevladeck), and, of course, through my newsletter (https://t.co/1ui2DpY3Cq). Hope to see you there. 185.6K views · 668 likes · 86 reposts · 72 replies Open on X →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

185.6K12 Nov
462
1.5K13 Nov
8010 Feb
30.3K7 May
24.6K
146K11 May
15K
3.7K
3.5K
2K
15.6K19 May

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.45%12 Nov
1.08%
0.40%13 Nov
3.75%10 Feb
0.29%7 May
1.58%
2.98%11 May
1.07%
6.85%
4.52%
6.93%
0.24%19 May

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views.

What the audience does

Likes67.6%4 623 in total
Reposts23.1%1 580 in total
Replies2.6%178 in total
Quotes0.7%46 in total
Bookmarks6.1%416 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Cuentas similares