Constitutional Court

@ConCourtSA · Johannesburg, South Africa · joined 12 May 2015

Official profile for the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

124 142Followers

0Following

3 037Posts total

21.6KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA11 Sep

https://t.co/Z3luvhsfL8

428 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA11 Sep

(2/3) uMndeni weNkosi does not have an exclusive customary right to adjudicate and withdraw recognition of an iNkosi under section 9 of the TKLA. 658 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA11 Sep

(3/3) CCT 116/25 Umndeni weNkosi of iNkosi Luthuli and Another v Executive Council, KwaZulu-Natal and Others. 492 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA11 Sep

(1/3) Judgment on Friday, 11 September 2026 at 10h00: Sections 21(4), 22, 23 and 24(1) of the KwaZulu‑Natal Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 5 of 2005 are not unconstitutional. 5K views · 4 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA11 Sep

(1/5) Judgment on Friday, 11 September 2026 at 10h00: The Constitutional Court considered whether the High Court committed an error of law by ordering the final sequestration of the Trust. 3.5K views · 9 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA10 Sep

(1/3) Judgment on Friday, 11 September 2026 at 10h00: Did the High Court commit an error of law when it ordered the final sequestration of the Trust? 3.4K views · 5 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA10 Sep

(1/3) Judgment to be handed down on Friday, 11 September 2026 at 10h00: Are sections 21(4), 22, 23 and 24(1) of the KwaZulu‑Natal Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 5 of 2005 unconstitutional? 3.4K views · 7 likes · 3 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA9 Sep

https://t.co/AqAYFiYBaW

268 views · 0 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA9 Sep

(3/4) Was the Supreme Court of Appeal correct to award costs against the applicants in light of the Biowatch principle? 275 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA9 Sep

(4/4) CCT 164/25 Endangered Wildlife Trust and Another v Acting Director-General, Department of Water and Sanitation and Another 265 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA9 Sep

(1/4) Hearing on 10 September 2026 at 10h00: Do the grounds of appeal raised by the Endangered Wildlife Trust and the Federation for a Sustainable Environment (applicants) raise questions of law under section 149(1)(a) of the National Water Act 36 of 1998? 3.5K views · 6 likes · 3 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Constitutional Court@ConCourtSA9 Sep

(2/4) To the extent that the applicants’ grounds of appeal raise questions of law, did the Water Tribunal err in respect of such questions? If so, what is an appropriate remedy? 394 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

12 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 100K–1M abonnés. en dessous de ses pairs à la fois en portée et en engagement.

Vues médianes575ce compte5 891médiane pour 100K–1M

Portée, %0.46%ce compte1.55%médiane pour 100K–1M

Engagement, %0.38%ce compte1.00%médiane pour 100K–1M

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 100K–1M	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	575	5 891	0.10×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	0.46%	1.55%	0.30×
Taux d'engagement	0.38%	1.00%	0.38×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3949 Sep

3.5K

265

275

268

3.4K10 Sep

3.4K

3.5K11 Sep

492

658

428

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

1.02%9 Sep

0.31%

0.38%

1.09%

0.37%

0.33%10 Sep

0.24%

0.32%11 Sep

0.12%

0.81%

0.76%

0.70%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.00%.

What the audience does

Likes47.1%40 in total

Reposts20.0%17 in total

Replies12.9%11 in total

Bookmarks20.0%17 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires