tweetindex
FR

Dale Johnson

@DaleJohnsonBBC

Football Issues Correspondent @BBCSport. Lots of VAR, plus regulations, coefficients and permutations. Views my own. Ex-ESPN.

87 081Followers
1 268Following
59 962Posts total
1.9MViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

@DaleJohnsonBBC Totally disagree he dived it has to a clear and obvious error Yes there was contact but every contact shouldn't be a penalty I'm sorry If he gave ut they wouldn't over turn it that's the problem 1.3K views · 10 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Think of it this way. A referee gives a penalty, a decision which many might disagree with. Yet the same time, people might also say "but I can see why he's given it". That is when you will get incorrect on-field, but not to the VAR threshold. 62.5K views · 155 likes · 8 reposts · 61 replies Open on X →
@DaleJohnsonBBC Wow. 5 people looked at that dive and 4 of them said penalty. 522 views · 9 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@DaleJohnsonBBC As clear a foul in the penalty area as you will ever see. Astounding that the referee missed it. He needs to be dismissed. A perfect example of how VAR could have corrected a clear an obvious error. But VAR does nothing. Ludicrous. VAR has to go. 1.2K views · 8 likes · 0 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
@DaleJohnsonBBC How many times is Oliver going to get away with this against Liverool? And why is 'threshold' still a thing it isn't. VAR are now guessing at calls to overturn them 12.3K views · 511 likes · 15 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
Nottingham Forest should not have been awarded a penalty at Liverpool for Alisson's challenge on Neco Williams, the KMI Panel has said. But the KMI Panel also added that it did not reach the threshold for the VAR to overturn the on-field decision. https://t.co/OUgwPYC0YX 1.8M views · 5K likes · 757 reposts · 519 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

6 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.

Vues médianes6 828ce compte1 070médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %7.84%ce compte3.77%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.90%ce compte1.65%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post6 8281 0706.38×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)7.84%3.77%2.08×
Taux d'engagement0.90%1.65%0.55×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.8M9 Sep
12.3K
1.2K
522
62.5K
1.3K

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.35%9 Sep
4.30%
0.97%
1.72%
0.36%
0.83%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.65%.

What the audience does

Likes76.0%5 680 in total
Reposts10.4%780 in total
Replies7.9%589 in total
Bookmarks5.7%429 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

9 Sep

Daily snapshots since 09 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Comptes similaires