Warren Gunnels ✓

@GunnelsWarren · joined 26 Jul 2014

Minority Staff Director for Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Ranking Member @SenSanders Blatantly Pro-Union AKA: Chief of Receipts

130 831Followers

2 381Following

15 673Posts total

7.6MViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren3 Sep

If Jeff Bezos, the 3rd richest man alive worth $276 billion, could afford to sail on his $500 million yacht to his $55 million wedding in Venice to give his wife a $5 million ring, he can damn well afford to pay Amazon delivery drivers a living wage with good benefits. 354.7K views · 26.2K likes · 4.4K reposts · 398 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren3 Sep

Your daily reminder that Medicare for All would save over $1 trillion and 114,000 lives a year with no premiums, no deductibles, and no co-payments, per Yale School of Public Health. Medicare for All is not too expensive. Our current broken healthcare system is. 10.9K views · 626 likes · 275 reposts · 28 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren2 Sep

Amazon is warning New Yorkers their deliveries could get slower and more expensive. The company says NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani's proposal could add an estimated $664 a year to the average household's delivery costs, while putting more than 5,000 delivery jobs at risk, per FOX 1.6M views · 6.1K likes · 344 reposts · 377 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren1 Sep

It now costs: $480,000 for a new pancreatic cancer drug. $600,000 for T-cell cancer treatment. $520,000 for a gastrointestinal cancer pill. $430,000 for a leukemia drug. Big PHARMA’s greed kills. Medicare for All would cap out of pocket drug costs at $200 a year. Let’s do it. 64.2K views · 2.6K likes · 848 reposts · 133 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren30 Aug

If Bernie’s Social Security bill is signed into law, Social Security would be solvent for 75 years, benefits would go up by $2,400, 91% of Americans would not pay a penny more in taxes and the wealthy would finally pay their fair share by scrapping the cap on all taxable income. 810.8K views · 28.2K likes · 6.2K reposts · 1.1K replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren30 Aug

Social Security benefits will be cut for tens of millions of retirees in late 2032, unless Congress takes action first. https://t.co/NIU8lVAaDD 1.2M views · 1.8K likes · 1.1K reposts · 403 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren3 Mar

@GunnelsWarren Elon Musk would have been forced to give up controlling interest of his companies before they were profitable, and Tesla and SpaceX would not exist today. This means we would not have electric cars and space launches would cost 10x what they cost today, making soci 41.5K views · 1.3K likes · 31 reposts · 64 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren2 Mar

@GunnelsWarren The govt already spends $7T per year. Forgive me for being skeptical that more tax revenue will solve any problem. 30.9K views · 900 likes · 4 reposts · 15 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren2 Mar

@GunnelsWarren A poor or middle class conservative reading anything pertaining to taxing a billionaire more: https://t.co/OqY7Pc2DUs 49.9K views · 1.8K likes · 34 reposts · 94 replies Open on X →

Warren Gunnels ✓@GunnelsWarren2 Mar

If Bernie's 5% annual wealth tax on billionaires had been enacted in 2012, Elon Musk would be worth less than $365 billion instead of the $834 billion that he's worth today. He'd still be the wealthiest man alive & every senior would have dental, vision & hearing under Medicare. 3.5M views · 85.5K likes · 12.2K reposts · 4K replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

6 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 100K–1M abonnés. diffusé bien au-delà de son propre public, et ce public réagit.

Vues médianes582 770ce compte4 872médiane pour 100K–1M

Portée, %445.44%ce compte1.68%médiane pour 100K–1M

Engagement, %5.03%ce compte1.22%médiane pour 100K–1M

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 100K–1M	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	582 770	4 872	120×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	4.5× audience	1.68%	265×
Taux d'engagement	5.03%	1.22%	4.13×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

3.5M2 Mar

49.9K

30.9K

41.5K3 Mar

1.2M30 Aug

810.8K

64.2K1 Sep

1.6M2 Sep

10.9K3 Sep

354.7K

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.96%2 Mar

3.81%

2.97%

3.29%3 Mar

0.29%30 Aug

4.39%

5.67%1 Sep

0.44%2 Sep

8.54%3 Sep

8.74%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 100K–1M accounts is 1.22%.

What the audience does

Likes80.5%155 064 in total

Reposts13.2%25 495 in total

Replies3.4%6 644 in total

Quotes0.5%902 in total

Bookmarks2.3%4 488 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Comptes similaires