tweetindex
FR

Nathan Donley

@Nathan_Donley

Proud dad. Environmental Health Science Director @CenterForBioDiv. Former Cancer Researcher at OHSU. Ph.D in Cellular Biology. Posting on pesticides

2 293Followers
781Following
316Posts total
2.1KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

@Nathan_Donley Wow, quoting yourself as an authority. I'll take "What is a Public Comment Period" for 500 Alex. https://t.co/MXt0xuZuvh Which was had. So yes, people had the seat at the table. They ordered, and then the decision was made. https://t.co/vOYSfz1swK
48 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
We need pesticide regulation reform NOW It is not ok to have pesticide approvals be dictated by what is palatable to the company rather than what the science says Read more here https://t.co/z6Isti1dvw 116 views · 3 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
EPA is letting Bayer choose dicamba mitigations like it’s ordering a la carte from Chili’s But guess who doesn’t get a choice? The 100s of thousands of Americans who will watch their crops, gardens, and trees wither up and die from dicamba gas wafting over their property lines 115 views · 2 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Bayer was also given 3 options on how it would like EPA to purportedly mitigate dicamba runoff. They chose option 3 https://t.co/1c1axh7wXH
112 views · 1 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
I mean think about it, the regulatory agency is going to the pesticide company and giving it a menu of options of how it would like to proceed – and also taking requests! That’s not oversight, that’s how you order dinner from a restaurant 86 views · 4 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The options Bayer chose to mitigate dicamba volatility and runoff were ultimately the ones EPA proposed in July 2025 EPA even included the additional item that Bayer requested the agency include, allowing full-field applications at higher temperatures if dicamba was not mixed ht
98 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Bayer also emailed the EPA about an additional option the company wanted Bayer suggested that there is less volatilization if dicamba is not mixed with other pesticides, which could allow it to be more widely sprayed at higher temperatures if it wasn’t mixed https://t.co/FD9ApED
111 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
The presentation concluded with a slide entitled “Registrant response needed” which posed the question “Which mitigation option to go forward with?” https://t.co/H645tGan0v
128 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
8 days later, Bayer emailed the EPA that “After discussion with EPA and reviewing these options carefully, Bayer would like to proceed as described below…” The company chose the option that would allow for dicamba applications to take place at higher temps https://t.co/E2nz9gGcU
124 views · 2 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
In an EPA presentation in May 2025, the agency presented Bayer with 2 options on how to limit how dicamba off-gasses and wafts in the air 1 option was to prevent use above 85 degrees and a less restrictive option allowed use up to 95 degrees if the acreage treated was reduced ht
149 views · 3 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
So how did this new 2026 reapproval get crafted? Well, from documents we got out of our dicamba litigation, it seems EPA simply asked the pesticide company Bayer what it wanted 155 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Federal court decisions in 2020 and again in 2024 struck down the agency’s previous approvals of the weedkiller as unlawful But early in 2026 the Trump EPA reapproved it again https://t.co/AYqcXgvHuO 173 views · 5 likes · 1 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
All of this involves Bayer's pesticide dicamba Since its approval in 2016, dicamba volatility has damaged millions of acres of farmland and caused damage to orchards, vegetable farms, home gardens, native plants, trees, and wildlife refuges across the US https://t.co/C0wXLVjY6j 430 views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
Experts have found dicamba drift damage to be the worst of any herbicide in the history of U.S. agriculture https://t.co/21neioIalO 224 views · 7 likes · 1 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

14 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de under 10K abonnés. touche moins de monde que ses pairs, mais les engage bien davantage.

Vues médianes120ce compte4 175médiane pour under 10K
Portée, %5.23%ce compte250.82%médiane pour under 10K
Engagement, %3.96%ce compte1.41%médiane pour under 10K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour under 10KRapport
Vues médianes par post1204 1750.03×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)5.23%2.5× audience0.02×
Taux d'engagement3.96%1.41%2.81×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

22410 Sep
430
173
155
149
124
128
111
98
86
112
115
116
48

Last 14 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

4.02%10 Sep
1.86%
4.62%
4.52%
3.36%
3.23%
3.91%
3.60%
4.08%
8.14%
2.68%
4.35%
6.03%
0.00%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for under 10K accounts is 1.41%.

What the audience does

Likes54.9%45 in total
Reposts19.5%16 in total
Replies18.3%15 in total
Bookmarks7.3%6 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires