tweetindex
FR

Matt Corallo 🟠 ✓

@TheBlueMatt · NY/SF, usually · joined 24 Feb 2011

10th known contributor to Bitcoin Core. Full-Time Open-Source Bitcoin+Lightning Projects @spiral_xyz. Open-Source Bitcoin for 15 years. Mostly reposting @soona.

78 171Followers
266Following
14 399Posts total
389.2KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

@TheBlueMatt @JWWeatherman_ @Blockstream Are their hardware devices (Jade) safe? 93 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →
@TheBlueMatt @JWWeatherman_ @Blockstream something about sideswap address being whitelisted too I think. Then sideswap sent out the BTC. So 11 of 15 signers, and then sideswap also signed a 4000BTC tx without looking at it. This is astounding incompetence. 344 views · 4 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@TheBlueMatt @Blockstream Ok, i think their post about the PAK threw me. Glad it remained a federation at least in some sense. 1.1K views · 6 likes · 0 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →
Anyone from @Blockstream even attempted to explain why a single company could drain Liquid? It was marketed as a multisig where a threshold of signers had to approve a withdrawal. I’m certain that was also in the technical docs. Yet it appears a single company and a single key 5.3K views · 62 likes · 6 reposts · 4 replies Open on X →
The liquid bug is a great example of why formal verification isn't magic and won't stop everything - when you have a bug in the integration logic, rather than in the verified crypto logic, its just as bad. 16.9K views · 160 likes · 13 reposts · 13 replies Open on X →
leftpad again. We learned nothing from leftpad. At least if the crate did a lot of complicated hard-to-get-right stuff I’d get it, but people are depending on a billion tiny utilities, of *course* one of them is going to get pop’d. 8K views · 25 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →
vaguely annoyed to see the "I called it" posts in response to https://t.co/Ay5DyxATh9 we knew this was possible when we built https://t.co/rILwnHUqlX. everybody knows that it was possible. you are downloading and executing code off the internet. 26.6K views · 246 likes · 20 reposts · 25 replies Open on X →
Another weird narrative post-ColdCard is that if we'd just had covenants (CTV, I guess?) it wouldn't have happened. This is nonsense. The many people who wanted the simplicity of generating one set of keys on one device couldn't use vaults - vaults require generating multiple 13.4K views · 110 likes · 10 reposts · 26 replies Open on X →
People got this weird idea after segwit that a “UASF” is this magic thing where a bunch of people on social media get together and start making threats and suddenly Bitcoin’s consensus rules will change. That’s nonsense. I’m sorry if you were told that the thing that activated 12K views · 157 likes · 25 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →
@hodlonaut BIP-148 definitely did have lobbyists working back channels. Many of those lobbyists and BIP-148 supporters back then, were on my side in 2026 fighting against BIP-110. BIP-148 was fundamentally different to BIP-148 in many ways: 1. The overwhelming majority of the B 31.9K views · 161 likes · 21 reposts · 22 replies Open on X →
It’s time for bitcoiners to step up and build. You don’t need to know anything about software development anymore, you just need to know how to write words! We have a golden opportunity to build out agentic payments based on open money, rather than letting agentic payments be 134.3K views · 778 likes · 145 reposts · 79 replies Open on X →
USDC on base seems far more common for 402 payments now than Bitcoin. Recently, even Stripe joined the bandwagon. That’s a centralized stablecoin on a permissioned chain. Agents are starting to use fiat. It’s a huge loss, and in a race, many aren’t even aware that it exists. The 139.2K views · 546 likes · 76 reposts · 68 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

10 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.

Vues médianes10 006ce compte935médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %12.80%ce compte3.66%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %1.10%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post10 00693510.7×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)12.80%3.66%3.50×
Taux d'engagement1.10%1.52%0.72×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

139.2K12 Feb
134.3K13 Feb
31.9K9 Aug
12K
13.4K10 Aug
26.6K20 Aug
8K21 Aug
16.9K7 Sep
5.3K9 Sep
1.1K
344
93

Last 12 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.50%12 Feb
0.75%13 Feb
0.64%9 Aug
1.55%
1.09%10 Aug
1.09%20 Aug
0.36%21 Aug
1.10%7 Sep
1.36%9 Sep
0.79%
1.16%
2.15%

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes73.1%2 256 in total
Reposts10.3%318 in total
Replies8.0%248 in total
Bookmarks8.6%264 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

10 Sep

Daily snapshots since 10 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Comptes similaires