tweetindex
FR

Tactical Football Analysis ✓

@TotalAnalysis · United Kingdom · joined 19 Apr 2018

The #1 Tactical Football Magazine Since 2018. 12,000+ articles on in-depth technical analysis, scouting reports, player analysis, and tactical breakdowns.

57 118Followers
3 710Following
42 688Posts total
15.3KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Toulouse’s double pivot escapes the press by sending one midfielder towards his own goal. He draws his marker in. His partner slips into the space behind him to receive free. How Askou adapts the pattern, plus two practices to coach it: https://t.co/oozVCM77lp https://t.co/udyN
1.6K views · 11 likes · 6 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Leeds’ second goal: a centre-back crossing, a wing-back scoring. Bogle wins it high. Justin fills the flank. Calvert-Lewin attacks the gap between Newcastle’s centre-backs, and his header goes in off Bogle. How Farke’s roles clicked: https://t.co/LtJups7Afg https://t.co/tZWRKZ5
1.8K views · 8 likes · 3 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
City had 10 men. United still faced a 3v3 on their right. Semenyo dropped into the back line as Dalot advanced, turning City’s 4-4-1 into a 5-3-1. How Maresca protected that flank and kept a route to Haaland: https://t.co/0E31AA9vpH https://t.co/CtVCL5oQfp
2.3K views · 24 likes · 7 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Brighton’s new ball-winner needs protection of his own. Chema Andrés averaged 2.21 interceptions per 90 at Stuttgart, but struggles to cover large spaces quickly. Why the player beside him could define his Brighton fit: https://t.co/FdLKEmMYvp https://t.co/8MGhtUmkWH
2K views · 8 likes · 4 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
@TotalAnalysis According to Graeme Souness Rice spent too much time in the back three. 🤣 124 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →
Arsenal moved Rice deeper to get Saka inside. Rice joined the back three, freeing White to push high and Saka to leave the touchline. On the left, Calafiori stepped into midfield. How Arsenal found space against Chelsea’s compact block: https://t.co/qLn3X6Z1Kn https://t.co/L9vu
7.5K views · 150 likes · 17 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

6 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. portée ordinaire pour sa taille, réaction plus faible que la moyenne.

Vues médianes1 913ce compte980médiane pour 10K–100K
Portée, %3.35%ce compte3.84%médiane pour 10K–100K
Engagement, %0.93%ce compte1.53%médiane pour 10K–100K
IndicateurCe compteMédiane pour 10K–100KRapport
Vues médianes par post1 9139801.95×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)3.35%3.84%0.87×
Taux d'engagement0.93%1.53%0.61×

Autres comptes de cette tranche →   Comparer avec un autre compte →   Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

7.5K8 Sep
124
2K14 Sep
2.3K15 Sep
1.8K16 Sep
1.6K17 Sep

Last 6 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

2.26%8 Sep
0.81%
0.60%14 Sep
1.36%15 Sep
0.60%16 Sep
1.06%17 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes67.3%202 in total
Reposts12.3%37 in total
Replies0.3%1 in total
Quotes0.3%1 in total
Bookmarks19.7%59 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires