Alex Boge ✓

@alexboge

Photographer, SCUBA DiveMaster, Harley-Davidson Rider, IPSC Open Master, degrees in CIS & Physics, studying conspiracies, Bitcoin+MSTR+ASTS+RKLB

18 078Followers

1 522Following

71 918Posts total

2.8MViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge14 Sep

@alexboge Never mind the fact that controlled demolitions first require lots of drilling and cutting in an empty building to weaken the structure. They don't just shove some dynamite (or PETN or RDX) in and push the button. A building the size of the towers would require tens of 436 views · 17 likes · 0 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge13 Sep

@alexboge Makes plenty of sense as it was A Major Attack ...They wanted as many people to stop and watch..Their Show That They put on.. ... 408 views · 9 likes · 2 reposts · 2 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge13 Sep

@alexboge Exactly, if all 3 buildings were set for controlled demolition they would have dropped 7 while it was in the smoke cloud from the adjacent collapsed wtc1 571 views · 15 likes · 0 reposts · 7 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge13 Sep

9/11 conspiracy theorists, I have two simple questions. Let’s set aside videos, simulations, and explosive claims. No science. No math. No engineering. No government reports. Just logic and common sense. 1. If WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7 were all secretly wired for demolition, and h

13.1K views · 438 likes · 33 reposts · 109 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

That showed the how, this video gives the physics for why the twin towers collapsed. https://t.co/VpfGDCOd65 327.2K views · 569 likes · 55 reposts · 17 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

My prior post featured simulations by Kostack Studio of the Twin Towers collapses. What made those especially fascinating to me was that they removed the smoke, debris, and surrounding visual clutter, making it easier to see the broader structural behavior that the real footage h

0:31

278.3K views · 483 likes · 41 reposts · 58 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

A day like today deserves this reminder: Accounts with “truth” in their name are almost certainly spreading lies. And if an account with “truth” in the handle is telling you the “real story” of 9/11, you can safely assume you’re about to get baseless, long-debunked conspiracy h

218.1K views · 810 likes · 51 reposts · 30 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

@alexboge 9/11 conspiracies are as exhausting and annoying as Moon landing conspiracy theories, but also more cruel and hateful. Anyone who supports such conspiratorial nonsense hates America, whether they know it or not. 1.2K views · 32 likes · 2 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

@alexboge https://t.co/sN1ncNhjrZ

151.2K views · 2.6K likes · 17 reposts · 11 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

WTC Building 7 was likewise simulated: https://t.co/ICnMVSJDYE 706K views · 1.2K likes · 89 reposts · 83 replies Open on X →

Alex Boge ✓@alexboge11 Sep

Full credit to Kostack Studio for the simulation. I excerpted the first two views because I think they show the large-scale behavior of the collapses particularly well. Full video: https://t.co/nh8H4IHZR9 And I’ll make a prediction. Take a look at the replies this post gets 1.1M views · 2K likes · 156 reposts · 71 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

11 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé à plus de monde que les comptes de taille comparable.

Vues médianes151 165ce compte999médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %836.18%ce compte3.88%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %1.75%ce compte1.53%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	151 165	999	151×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	8.4× audience	3.88%	216×
Taux d'engagement	1.75%	1.53%	1.15×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

1.1M11 Sep

706K

151.2K

1.2K

218.1K

278.3K

327.2K

13.1K13 Sep

571

408

43614 Sep

Last 11 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.20%11 Sep

0.20%

1.75%

2.81%

0.41%

0.21%

0.20%

4.42%13 Sep

3.85%

3.19%

4.36%14 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.53%.

What the audience does

Likes70.0%8 204 in total

Reposts3.8%446 in total

Replies3.3%391 in total

Bookmarks22.9%2 684 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

Followers by day

12 Sep

Daily snapshots since 12 Sep 2026; the dashed line is the starting count.

Derniers posts

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

Growth & engagement

Views per post

Engagement rate per post

What the audience does

Followers by day

Comptes similaires