chrisrohlf ✓

@chrisrohlf · joined 27 Feb 2009

Waging algorithmic warfare since 2003. Engineer, Researcher. Non-Resident Research Fellow @CSETGeorgetown CyberAI

11 797Followers

945Following

1 579Posts total

81.8KViews on collected posts

Derniers posts

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf18 Sep

Security professionals with published vulnerabilities, research, and conference talks are not "randos". The security community has its niches like any other, and some of the most talented have no online presence. What talent pool do foreign and domestic intelligence agencies 5.2K views · 86 likes · 9 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf17 Sep

Resharing a piece I wrote in 2024 on replication of agents through work, cyber crime, and exploitation. Much of this piece is still relevant today, particularly in light of the OAI/HF incident. https://t.co/XpSDHud1wG 1.2K views · 6 likes · 1 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf16 Sep

@chrisrohlf This really pisses me off because you make it sound like competent tech people are asleep at the wheel. They aren't and never were. What happened was that management always deprioritised security work, because it was an economic sink. Users begrudgingly accepted that 473 views · 3 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf16 Sep

@chrisrohlf "Sleepwalked" is right, and the pattern's repeating with agents. We shipped them with production access first and asked "what can they reach?" second. The bitter lesson isn't new — we just handed it a bigger blast radius 111 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 0 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf16 Sep

@chrisrohlf yep 829 views · 0 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf15 Sep

If you think OAI/HF incident is not important because the attack was not sufficiently technically sophisticated, or used well known techniques, or could have been solved with well understood defenses, then you're missing the point. Agents cannot be deterred the way humans can. 6.9K views · 47 likes · 8 reposts · 8 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf15 Sep

In the last several years AI has progressed rapidly but predictably, and in that time the cyber community learns the bitter lesson over and over again. We’ve collectively sleep walked into the current state of things and now I see emotionally driven responses when those outside 31.8K views · 110 likes · 18 reposts · 5 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf27 Aug

Consider this my endorsement of this letter. There are technical solutions to most problems in cyber security and AI can efficiently apply all of them at scale. Enable your security team to be a force multiplier with these tools, not a permanent cost center. 13.2K views · 35 likes · 3 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf23 Dec 2025

@chrisrohlf thanks for slides. for discussion never loved defenders dilemma, as an attacker i have to be right a lot: right stager, escalation method, right pivot, right comms, each moment can potentially go wrong and get me caught. different if im just directly accessing the 95 views · 1 likes · 0 reposts · 1 replies Open on X →

chrisrohlf ✓@chrisrohlf25 Oct 2025

This week I had the pleasure of guest lecturing at both Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins SAIS on the intersection of AI, cyber and national security. You can find a brief overview of the topics I covered and my slides here. https://t.co/2bmRfKyFGc 22K views · 64 likes · 15 reposts · 3 replies Open on X →

Face aux comptes de taille comparable

8 posts des 90 derniers jours, à côté de la tranche de 10K–100K abonnés. diffusé largement, mais peu de ces spectateurs réagissent.

Vues médianes3 179ce compte924médiane pour 10K–100K

Portée, %26.95%ce compte3.62%médiane pour 10K–100K

Engagement, %0.51%ce compte1.52%médiane pour 10K–100K

Indicateur	Ce compte	Médiane pour 10K–100K	Rapport
Vues médianes par post	3 179	924	3.44×
Portée (vues ÷ abonnés)	26.95%	3.62%	7.44×
Taux d'engagement	0.51%	1.52%	0.33×

Autres comptes de cette tranche → Comparer avec un autre compte → Comment ces repères sont établis →

Growth & engagement

How the posts we collected actually performed: views and reaction rate post by post, what the audience did with them, and where the follower count goes.

Views per post

22K25 Oct

9523 Dec

13.2K27 Aug

31.8K15 Sep

6.9K

82916 Sep

111

473

1.2K17 Sep

5.2K18 Sep

Last 10 collected posts, oldest on the left. The scale is logarithmic: one post can outrun the rest a hundred times over.

Engagement rate per post

0.38%25 Oct

2.11%23 Dec

0.32%27 Aug

0.43%15 Sep

0.94%

0.12%16 Sep

0.00%

0.63%

0.58%17 Sep

1.96%18 Sep

Reactions — likes, reposts, replies and quotes — divided by views. Median for 10K–100K accounts is 1.52%.

What the audience does

Likes58.0%352 in total

Reposts8.9%54 in total

Replies4.3%26 in total

Quotes1.6%10 in total

Bookmarks27.2%165 in total

Share of every reaction we collected for this account. Replies mean argument, reposts mean endorsement, bookmarks mean the post was worth keeping.

The follower curve appears once this account has two daily snapshots — we take one a day, and this one is on its first.

Comptes similaires

Frequently asked questions about @chrisrohlf

How many followers does @chrisrohlf have?

11 797 followers.

How many posts has @chrisrohlf published?

1 579 posts.

How do posts by @chrisrohlf perform?

Collected posts: 10. Views: 81 781. Likes: 352.